Dr. Tom Hennessy, MD, MPH (Courtesy)

Dr. Tom Hennessy, MD, MPH (Courtesy)

Voices of the Peninsula: Don’t take medical advice from politicians, athletes or social media

Evidence leads to consensus among medical doctors: Vaccines are the best way to prevent infection.

By Dr. Tom Hennessy

For the Homer News

Recently, Alaskans have heard advice about alternative COVID-19 treatments from unusual sources: politicians, athletes, social media, and a few doctors without expertise in infectious diseases. They say they want to save lives, but the treatments they endorse are not used by doctors who are treating COVID-19 patients in our hospitals and intensive care units. What should Alaskans do with such advice? As a medical doctor, I’m saddened by the toll COVID-19 has taken on our state. My 30-year career has focused on preventing and controlling infectious diseases in Alaska. Here’s what I think about this advice and what we should do.

We’ve all heard the phrase, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” This is true for COVID-19. It’s a tragic fact that Alaskans are dying needlessly from COVID-19 while we have free, widely available vaccines that are proven to be safe and very effective. Of the 205 Alaskans who died from COVID-19 during July through September, 73% were not vaccinated for COVID-19. Their deaths could have been prevented by vaccination.

Among medical doctors, there is strong consensus about vaccination. In May, a survey of U.S. doctors by the American Medical Association found 96% were vaccinated. All the major professional organizations of U.S. doctors recommend COVID-19 vaccination. This includes the 67,000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the 134,000 family physicians of AAFP, the 60,000 obstetricians of ACOG and the 161,000 internal medicine doctors of ACP. Vaccination is our best defense against COVID-19.

When we didn’t know much about COVID-19 it was understandable that doctors tried many different treatments. However, by testing treatments using scientific methods we have found some that work and discarded many that didn’t. For example, a malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, looked promising but when evaluated in clinical trials it did not help COVID-19 patients and caused harmful side effects. So, the Food and Drug Administration said hydroxychloroquine should not be used for COVID-19.

Another example is ivermectin, a drug for worm infestations. Some people claim ivermectin cures COVID-19. However, much of their evidence are stories of patients with no comparison group. Meanwhile, careful reviews of published ivermectin studies do not show a benefit for COVID-19. Before doctors recommend a treatment we require comparison studies of similar patients who are given different treatments. Two large clinical trials of ivermectin are ongoing; until they are completed it would be unwise and wasteful to use ivermectin for COVID-19. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) COVID-19 guidelines do not recommend ivermectin. The same is true for other alternative treatments, such as vitamin D, zinc, antibiotics and aspirin. They have no proven benefit for COVID-19 when studied in clinical trials.

Some ask, “What is the harm in trying these alternative treatments?” One harm is that people won’t use proven tools for COVID-19 because they think unproven alternative treatments will work. If they don’t get vaccinated and hope they can take ivermectin when they’re sick, they are gambling with an unproven drug against a known killer, COVID-19. Another harm is patients may not seek a proven early treatment: monoclonal antibodies. These are proteins specifically developed to fight this virus. They reduce the chance of hospitalization and death in high-risk patients who get COVID-19. For unknown reasons, many proponents of unproven treatments do not mention these monoclonal antibodies, even though they are recommended by NIH and are free.

Some ask, “Can’t doctors prescribe any drug they want to any patient?” It’s true: COVID-19 treatment guidelines are not requirements and doctors have the legal right to prescribe medications for other uses. However, doctors have an ethical responsibility to recommend treatments that have been proven effective. That is why doctors refuse to prescribe ivermectin when patients ask for it: There is no proven benefit.

Medical doctors rely on evidence not opinions and stories. For COVID-19, the evidence has led to strong consensus: Preventing an infection is better than trying to treat it. Vaccines are the best way to prevent infections for adults, children and pregnant women. Monoclonal antibodies are our best early treatment. The unproven alternative treatments have either been shown ineffective or need convincing studies before they should be used.

Don’t take medical advice from politicians, athletes or social media. If you have questions, talk with your medical provider or visit the Alaska DHSS website to get the latest recommendations (https://dhss.alaska.gov/dph/Epi/id/Pages/COVID-19/default.aspx )

Dr. Tom Hennessy is an affiliate professor of Health Sciences at the University of Alaska Anchorage. He served as an infectious disease epidemiologist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for 25 years and was a captain with the U.S. Public Health Service.

More in Opinion

The official ballot for the Aug. 16, 2022, Special General Election features ranked choice voting. (State of Alaska Division of Elections)
Voices of the Peninsula: Check out the ballot before you vote

This kind of ballot is not something you have seen before.

Former Gov. Bill Walker, right, and his running mate former commissioner of the Department of Labor and Workforce Development Heidi Drygas, speak to Juneauites gathered for a fundraiser at a private home in Juneau on Tuesday, June 7, 2022. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Why I’m voting for Walker

Walker is the only candidate with the potential to govern effectively for all Alaskans.

Nick Begich III campaign materials sit on tables ahead of a May 16 GOP debate held in Juneau. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Nick Begich is who Alaska and America need now

It is in Alaska’s best interest to elect a member of the Republican party

State Sen. Josh Revak (Photo provided)
The time has come to end Big Tech’s rule

The hope is that the bipartisan American Innovation and Choice Online Act (S. 2992) will come to the Senate floor for a vote

Michael Heimbuch attends a memorial service for the late Drew Scalzi on Aug. 5, 2005, at the Seafarers Memorial on the Homer Spit in Homer, Alaska. (Photo by Michael Armstrong/Homer News)
Point of View: King salmon: The clash of culture and science

People do some pretty awful things to king salmon stocks

Lieutenant governor candidate Edie Grunwald speaks at a Charlie Pierce campaign event at Paradisos restaurant in Kenai on Saturday, March 5, 2022. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Election Integrity: An Alaskan question with an Alaskan answer

A needless round of feel-good meetings and what-if conversations will be a thing of the past

This photo shows the University of Alaska Southeast campus in Juneau. (Jonson Kuhn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: I’m a longtime educator, and I’m supporting Walker/Drygas

The issues our state faces are significant with regard to education.

Larry Persily (Peninsula Clarion file)
Opinion: Congress could keep health insurance costs from rising, but it has to act fast

The cost of health insurance will rise substantially next year for about 13 million Americans

The offical ballot for the Aug. 16, 2022, Special General Election features ranked choice voting. (State of Alaska Divison of Elections)
Opinion: Alaskans deserve an election system that represents our differences

The new system’s goal is to make this election cycle transparent, secure and easy for all Alaskans to vote

UAA Chancellor Sean Parnell (Courtesy)
Opinion: UAA’s career certificates are helping to fill Alaska’s workforce pipeline

At UAA, we are announcing a new suite of certificate programs responding to some of the state’s most critical needs

Opinion: Remaining vigilant after 30 years

Exxon Valdez spurred both federal and state legislatures, the industry, and the public to come together