‘No offense’

I am about to weigh in on a topic I would not normally comment on here. I might gnash my teeth a little and yell at the radio couple of times. Maybe drive Hubby nuts with expletives about “other people not being able to read” but generally, my partisan political rantings I keep to myself and a few select friends who know when to ignore me and let things take their natural course of being forgotten in a day or two.

But now that this issue has reared its ugly head in our little town, I need take a stand, if only to muddy the waters a little.

I’m talking about the Veterans Memorial in Leif Hansen Park commissioned by the city from a local artist, and so-called “religious display.” But first let me tell you that I am a firm believer in separation of church and state in its purest form. I don’t want the government to tell me what church to go to, or which god to worship or not. And I certainly don’t expect the government to burn witches at the stake or put “non-believers” in the stocks for all to ridicule. I believe that the founding fathers understood the inherent problems with government-fostered religion, but I also accept that they all believed in a Supreme Power, whatever that may be, as throughout the Declaration of Independence reference is made to “Nature’s God” and “Divine Providence.”

I remember, as do some of you, I’m sure, as a teenager laughing at “banned in Boston” when certain movies or books were reputed to be too risqué for “good people” according to supposed “church authorities.” I recall not being able to buy uncensored copies of “Lady Chatterly’s Lover,” “Fanny Hill” or “Tropic of Cancer” in the U.S. because Congress deemed the “moral code” of the country wouldn’t allow it.

And, truth be told, I have lamented a few times since the repeal of that law in 1960, about the lack of standards in the media, and the loose definition of “redeeming social value” but never have I ever thought that the government should have a hand in determining what is morally acceptable for my consumption. It is my prerogative to not go to the theater, to switch the channel, to not read the book, or simply to hide in the woods if I want to avoid something.

But back to the topic at hand: everyone cites the First Amendment of the Constitution when referring to separation of church and state. They interpret it to mean that “the government,” either federal or civic, can not in any way proffer anything slightly religious on their properties or in their writings, and probably in other ways not yet thought of and the definition of “religious” is becoming broader and broader. In reality, the first amendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (and it goes on about the other freedoms of speech, press, assembly and redress).

In my opinion, every time an individual is stopped from exhibiting his or her religious feelings anyplace or berated for doing so, that is prohibition “of free exercise thereof.” While “freedom from religion” may be implied in the amendment, broadening the context does not make it more correct; it just makes it more subject to interpretation. The implication does not extend to denying someone the right of “free exercise thereof.” Why is it offensive to an atheist to see people praying, but not offensive to someone wanting to pray who is denied the right?

When I was in grade school we stood for the Pledge of Allegiance every morning. Some of my classmates were of a religion which did not allow them to honor an icon. They simply did not participate while the rest of us stood for the salute. They were not offended, and we were not offended because they didn’t take part. I don’t remember there ever being a confrontation because of their obligations, or ours. It was a simple recognition of our differences and an acceptance and respect for the others’ beliefs.

Unfortunately, that concept is as unfamiliar to present day society as is walking to school or talking on the phone — still viable but not universally practiced. We have become a “grievance society”: if you believe something I don’t, I have the right to be offended when you practice your belief and apparently also the right to mount an effort to deny you that right. And if you fight back, file a lawsuit to prohibit you from the lawful practice of your belief.

I understand the artist’s confusion that the Kenai City Council would not take a stand for the memorial as it is but instead “tabled indefinitely” the motion to that end. Politics being what they are, they acted expediently, if not auspiciously. Anyone who belongs to an organization where Robert’s Rules are the law knows that “tabled indefinitely” dooms the issue to Purgatory forever. (Please forgive me the religious reference.)

May I suggest that this issue was much ado about nothing. A picture of a cross-shaped grave marker is no more overtly religious than the absence of said picture is atheistic. Let’s get back to respect for our differences instead of storming the walls every time someone dares to voice something contrary to our opinion. Let’s practice live and let live for a while.

Virginia Walters lives in Kenai. Email her vewalters@gci.net.

More in Life

This Korean rice porridge, called dak juk, is easy to digest but hearty and nutritious, perfect for when you’re learning how to eat. (Photo by Tressa Dale/Peninsula Clarion)
A comforting meal for new beginnings

Rice porridge is a common first solid meal for many, many babies around the world

file
Minister’s Message: The sound of God’s voice

In all my desperate prayers, I sometimes forget that God has spoken definitively already

Rivers and Ice by Susan Pope. (Promotional photo)
KPC Showcase to feature discussion with Alaska author Susan Pope

Pope will discuss her memoir “Rivers and Ice: A Woman’s Journey Toward Family and Forgiveness”

Promotional photo courtesy Sony Pictures
Carrie Coon, Paul Rudd, Finn Wolfhard, Mckenna Grace and Celeste O’Connor appear in “Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire.”
On the Screen: New ‘Ghostbusters’ struggles to balance original ideas and nostalgia

“Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire” picks up right where “Afterlife” left off, and it also succumbs to a lot of the same problems

document from ancestry.com
William Raymond “W.R.” Benson’s draft-registration card from 1942 reveals that he was 52 years old, living in Seward and self-employed. His wife, Mable, is listed as a person who will always know his address.
Hometown Booster: The W.R. Benson Story — Part 2

W.R. Benson was a mover and a shaker throughout his life, but particularly so in Alaska

Terri Zopf-Schoessler and Donna Shirnberg rehearse “The Odd Couple: The Female Version” at the Kenai Performers’ Theater near Soldotna, Alaska, on Tuesday, March 19, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
‘Iconic, classic comedy’

Kenai Performers debuts “The Odd Couple: The Female Version”

Photo provided by Sara Hondel
Sara Hondel stands with a leprechaun during Sweeney’s St. Patrick’s Day Parade in Soldotna on Sunday. Green, leprechauns and Nugget the Moose poured down the streets for the 34th annual parade hosted by the Soldotna Chamber of Commerce. Under cloudy skies — but fortunately no precipitation — a procession of viridescent celebrants representing businesses and organizations brought festivities to an array of attendees lining Redoubt Avenue.
Go green or go home

Soldotna turns out for St. Patrick’s Day parade

Eggplants, garlic, lemon juice and tahini make up this recipe for baba ghanouj. (Photo by Tressa Dale/Peninsula Clarion)
When making a good example is hard to swallow

Preparing baba ghanouj despite a dislike of eggplant

William Raymond “W.R.” Benson (front row, far right) poses along with the rest of the Sigma Nu fraternity at Albion College in Michigan in about 1908. Despite a lifetime spent in the public eye, Benson was apparently seldom captured on film. This image is one of the few photos of him known to exist. (photo from the 1908 Albion College yearbook via ancestry.com)
Hometown Booster: The W.R. Benson Story — Part 1

W.R. Benson was a man almost constantly in motion

Most Read