What others say: Price controls on dairy products will do more harm than good

  • Sunday, December 27, 2015 9:49pm
  • Opinion

California dairy farmers have a big beef with the California Department of Food and Agriculture, which sets the minimum prices for milk in the state. Unhappy with a divergence in state and federal milk price controls in recent years, the dairy farmers have launched a campaign to be regulated under the federal government’s rules.

Their proposal would establish an all-milk price almost 7 percent higher than the current price, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that it would increase annual producer revenue by $700 million a year.

This does not bode well for milk processors, who buy the milk from the farmers to make cheese, butter, yogurt and other products. Nor would consumers appreciate paying higher prices for their dairy goods.

“Market conditions we can respond to,” Rachel Kaldor, executive director of the Dairy Institute of California, a trade group that represents milk processors, told us. “But if it’s just the government setting the price then that’s a problem for us in California.”

Moreover, she said, since prices are arbitrarily set, and not responsive to market forces, regulators “have to hit the bull’s-eye to ensure all milk produced is sold.”

Herein lies the problem with price controls, whether imposed by the state or the federal government: No central planner can ever hope to amass or quantify all the information and changing preferences of millions of consumers to determine the “correct price” for a good; this can only be determined through the decentralized forces of the market, as revealed and altered by consumers’ purchasing decisions. It is what Nobel Prize-winning economist Friedrich A. Hayek explained as the “knowledge problem.”

Exchanging a set of heavy-handed state regulations for even stricter federal regulations is no solution, particularly if the purpose is simply to benefit narrow special interests — in this case, the large dairy farmers — at the expense of consumers.

Not only should the federal government not agree to gouge consumers even more than they already are, these Depression-era “marketing order” regulations should be eliminated, and dairy farmers forced to be subject to the same market pressures that producers of other goods and services must navigate.

More in Opinion

Baisden family dog, Tug, is photographed in this undated photo. (Photo courtesy Rhonda Baisden)
Opinion: Ode to a good boy

The reality of saying goodbye hit us like a freight train

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: Why we’re not ranking Vance on the ballot

We will rank the other two candidates

Kenai Courthouse is photographed on Feb. 26, 2019, in Kenai, Alaska. (Clarion file)
Opinion: Seeking justice for our son

These state troopers need to be held accountable for their actions, and never let this happen again

Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo
U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski talks to supporters during a campaign event at Louie’s Douglas Inn on Oct. 12, 2022.
Opinion: Murkowski must get off the ‘none of the above’ fence

She needs to follow Cheney’s lead and endorse Harris

This November 2022 file photos shows Alaska Division of Elections Director Gail Fenumiai explaining the ranked choice tabulation for the 2022 U.S. House race. Democratic incumbent Mary Peltola prevailed over Republican former Gov. Sarah Palin by a final tally of 54.9% to 45.1% after lower-finishing candidates Republican Nick Begich III amd Libertarian Chris Bye were eliminated during the first two rounds of instant choice runoffs. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire file)
Opinion: Ranked choice voting and open primaries diminish political party control. That’s great for Alaska.

The fact that both private political organizations are opposed to open primaries and RCV should be a red flag for us all

Voting booths are set up at the Soldotna Regional Sports Complex on Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2022, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
A few votes can make all the difference

Because we are expecting a low voter turnout, your vote carries more weight

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks during a debate with Rep. Ben Carpenter organized by the District 8 Alaska Republican Party at the Soldotna Regional Sports Complex in Soldotna, Alaska, on Monday, Aug. 12, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Legislation encourages professional development for teachers

This bill provides incentives to teachers to seek the most rigorous and effective professional development they can.

Alex Koplin. Photo courtesy of Alex Koplin.
Point of View: The 2020 election was safe and secure

How can so many voters be so misinformed?

The Kenai Safeway is seen on Wednesday, July 20, 2022. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: AG’s silence on Kroger-Albertsons merger is failing Alaskans

We are concerned for all Alaskan consumers and for Alaska’s food security.

AKPIRG logo. Photo courtesy of AKPIRG
Opinion: With the right regulations, the SAVE Act can unlock energy prosperity in Alaska

Since 2010, only homeowners have been able to invest in and earn monthly bill savings from rooftop solar

The Safeway supermarket in Juneau, seen here Oct. 4, 2023, is among those in Alaska scheduled to be sold if its parent company, Albertsons Companies Inc., merges with Kroger Co., the parent company of Fred Meyer. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Alaska’s attorney general flunks math test

One supermarket owner is less competitive than two, and more competition is good for shoppers

Jenny Carroll (Courtesy)
Opinion: Homer Harbor plays critical role in community, economy

This gateway to Cook Inlet fuels everything from recreation and food security to commercial enterprises