What others say: Fairbanks Four controversey won’t die anytime soon

  • Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:38pm
  • Opinion

It seems somehow fitting that a proposed settlement between the state and the four men convicted of John Hartman’s 1997 murder has been — at least for the moment — derailed by questions over what is permissible under the law. After all, the case of the men who have come to be known as the Fairbanks Four has never been clean, easy or straightforward. While supporters of the men would likely have cheered their release under any circumstances, Judge Paul Lyle was right to throw on the brakes. Proceeding on an uncertain legal footing would only have muddied the water further, leaving the door open for potential relitigation, challenges and more court battles.

The deal worked out between the state and the four men was simple on its face: immediate release from prison, with the state maintaining its position that the four were guilty of the murder and other crimes and the four withdrawing their claim of actual innocence and forfeiting any right to seek remuneration for what they saw as prosecutorial misconduct. It would have spelled the end of the case for good — by releasing the state, city and any other potential figures in the case from liability, there would be no potential for a civil suit related to the manner in which the case was investigated and prosecuted.

But that resolution would be too clean in a case with so many twists and turns already. Upon reviewing it, Judge Lyle rightly saw the biggest question it raises: If the four men were originally convicted, the state was maintaining their guilt and the men were waiving their claim of innocence, under what legal grounds could they be released? Furthermore, part of the agreement would be that the state could retry the men if new evidence arose indicating their guilt — how would that not violate prohibitions against double jeopardy?

It’s easy to see why such a deal would be attractive to both sides in the case. An early release from prison would be a big symbolic victory for the four, as even though the state would have maintained their guilt, it would indicate that enough was wrong with the case that authorities saw fit to set the men free. And every day not spent in prison would be one the men could use getting back to as close to a normal life as possible, attempting to move on from the episode that defined two decades of their lives. For the state, it would be a huge relief to not have to worry about the potential for a massive civil judgment if the men ultimately proved successful in seeking a declaration of actual innocence.

For all its perks, however, the deal also makes both sides look a bit worse: The four would be giving up their claim to actual innocence, which has long been the cornerstone their supporters have rallied around. Relinquishing that claim would look to some like an acknowledgement that the men’s hands were not as clean as they and their supporters had maintained. And as for the state, while its attorneys could claim to still be assured of the men’s guilt, the fact they were willing to strike a deal granting early release for the men seems a tacit admission that there were major problems with the case’s investigation and prosecution that create serious worries of a civil jury awarding the men damages for their incarceration or treatment by the judicial system.

There may yet be precedent that would allow the deal to go forward. But no one should labor under the misapprehension that even if it does, it will remove the cloud hanging over both the men and the state’s prosecution of the case. At this point, no settlement can resolve the questions about both sides of the case lingering in the minds of many Alaskans — and that suggests any healing and regaining of trust in the justice system may be a long time coming.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner,

Dec. 13

More in Opinion

This screenshot of an Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation map of PFAS sites in Alaska shows that contamination from so-called “forever chemicals” is observable throughout the state. (Screenshot | Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation)
Opinion: More action must be taken on PFAS

Toxic forever chemicals present in high concentrations in Nikishka Bay Utility Water Supply

Logo courtesy of League of Women Voters.
League of Women Voters of Alaska: Join us in calling for campaign finance limits

The involvement of money in our elections is a huge barrier for everyday Alaskans who run for public office

Promise garden flowers are assembled for the Walk to End Alzheimer’s at the Soldotna Regional Sports Complex in Soldotna, Alaska, on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Let’s keep momentum in the fight against Alzheimer’s

It’s time to reauthorize these bills to keep up our momentum in the fight to end Alzheimer’s and all other types of Dementia.

Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press
Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., questions Navy Adm. Lisa Franchetti during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Sept. 14 on Capitol Hill.
Opinion: Music to the ears of America’s adversaries

Russia and China have interest in seeing America’s democracy and standing in the world weakened

Dr. Sarah Spencer. (Photo by Maureen Todd and courtesy of Dr. Sarah Spencer)
Opinion: Alaskans needs better access to addiction treatment. Telehealth can help.

I have witnessed firsthand the struggles patients face in accessing addiction care

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Need for accounting and legislative oversight of the permanent fund

There is a growing threat to the permanent fund, and it is coming from the trustees themselves

(Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Imagine the cost of health and happiness if set by prescription drug companies

If you didn’t have heartburn before seeing the price, you will soon — and that requires another prescription

Mike Arnold testifies in opposition to the use of calcium chloride by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities on Kenai Peninsula roads during a Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2023, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Kenai Peninsula Votes: Civic actions that carried weight

Watching an impressive display of testimony, going to an event, or one post, can help so many people learn about something they were not even aware of

The Kasilof River is seen from the Kasilof River Recreation Area, July 30, 2019, in Kasilof, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Helicopter fishing a detriment to fish and fishers

Proposal would prohibit helicopter transport for anglers on southern peninsula

The cover of the October 2023 edition of Alaska Economic Trends magazine, a product of the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development. (Image via department website)
Dunleavy administration’s muzzling of teacher pay report is troubling

Alaska Economic Trends is recognized both in Alaska and nationally as an essential tool for understanding Alaska’s unique economy

Image via weseeyou.community
5 tips for creating a culture of caring in our high schools

Our message: No matter what challenges you’re facing, we see you. We support you. And we’re here for you.

The Alaska State Capitol is photographed in Juneau, Alaska. (Clarise Larson/Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Vance’s bill misguided approach to Middle East crisis

In arguing for her legislation, Vance offers a simplistic, one-dimensional understanding of the conflict