What others say: Dire times for university sports in Alaska

  • Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:31pm
  • Opinion

The good news for the University of Alaska as it finds its way forward amid a difficult budget situation is it has options. The bad news is all of them are unpalatable to a broad swath of Alaskans. UA President Jim Johnsen rolled out the framework of his Strategic Pathways plan last week. Though Interior residents had known its effects would be major and far-reaching, many hadn’t prepared for the reality of what the tens of millions of dollars sliced from the university budget would necessitate.

In particular, three options put forth to reduce costs in the university’s athletic departments lay bare how serious those cuts will be. Nearly all options under consideration would result in the end of the Nanooks’ most popular and successful sports teams — rifle, hockey, cross-country running and skiing.

There are three athletics options under consideration by the university. Under the first, the University of Alaska Anchorage and University of Alaska Fairbanks would end all sports. This “nuclear option” would save the university the most money — as much as 5 percent of the overall UA budget — but even the institution’s own materials laying out that plan acknowledge that it would be widely unpopular on and off campus.

The second option would see an unprecedented combined-campus athletics approach in which each campus would retain a few sports, but one campus would be named as the “sponsoring institution.” This plan is most similar in approach to the overall design of the Strategic Pathways plan for academics — a focus on each campus’ respective strengths. In both cases, the devil is in the details. No details have been given about which campuses would be most likely to retain which sports, but it’s easy to make some inferences. It’s hard to see UAA losing basketball or volleyball, given the $110 million stadium the Legislature gifted that campus, which means those sports would likely end at UAF. There would be an easier case for UAF to keep rifle and swimming, because those programs aren’t duplicated at UAA. Hockey and cross-country running and skiing would be the big question marks. Although UAF has the more historic hockey program, the population base in Anchorage and, perhaps more importantly, the legislative power base there could spell curtains for Nanook hockey.

The third option would be for both campuses to drop to D2 status, which would mean the end of hockey, swimming, rifle and cross-country skiing, replacing them with other sports less popular (and more ill-suited climatically) in Alaska: soccer, golf and/or track. An addendum to the third option would have UAF keep its current slate of sports while only making reductions at UAA, but it’s hard to imagine that option being selected, given the Legislature’s commitment to (and, some would say, preference for) that campus. Additionally, each option that would retain more sports would save less money.

It’s an ugly scenario, but the university has been boxed into a corner by increasing costs and decreasing funding allocations from the Legislature. Some have accused the university of proposing such major cuts to athletics solely to generate public outcry, but the facts tell a different story. Simply put, athletics at the university have never been anywhere close to self-supporting. Even with ticket sales and student fees that contribute squarely to sports, programs run a deficit every year. And, unlike other schools where athletics are supported by strong alumni giving, that tradition doesn’t exist in Alaska. It’s difficult to justify major cuts to academic programs while athletics are held harmless, and the university is looking everywhere it can to save money and protect its core offerings.

The situation facing the University of Alaska isn’t a pretty one, and athletics will be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to changes on campus. The bottom line is that where we spend our money is a reflection of our values — the days of getting things we don’t have to pay for are over. If Alaskans want athletics — or any other function — at the university to continue, we’ll have to shoulder that expense.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Aug. 19

More in Opinion

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: Public schools do much more than just teach the three Rs

Isn’t it worth spending the money to provide a quality education for each student that enters our schools?

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to reporters at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter to the Editor: Law enforcement officers helped ensure smooth, secure energy conference

Their visible commitment to public safety allowed attendees to focus fully on collaboration, learning, and the important conversations shaping our path forward.

Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo
The present-day KTOO public broadcasting building, built in 1959 for the U.S. Army’s Alaska Communications System Signal Corps, is located on filled tidelands near Juneau’s subport. Today vehicles on Egan Drive pass by the concrete structure with satellite dishes on the roof that receive signals from NPR, PBS and other sources.
My Turn: Stand for the community radio, not culture war optics

Alaskans are different and we pride ourselves on that. If my vehicle… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) delivers his annual speech to the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, March 20, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Sullivan, Trump and the rule of lawlessness

In September 2023, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan established his own Alaska Federal… Continue reading

UAA Provost Denise Runge photographed outside the Administration and Humanities Building at the University of Alaskas Anchorage. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: UAA’s College of Health — Empowering Alaska’s future, one nurse at a time

At the University of Alaska Anchorage, we understand the health of our… Continue reading

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, address a joint session of the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: A noncongressman for Alaska?

It’s right to ask whether Nick Begich is a noncongressman for Alaska.… Continue reading

Boats return to the Homer Harbor at the end of the fishing period for the 30th annual Winter King Salmon Tournament on Saturday, March 23, 2024 in Homer, Alaska. (Delcenia Cosman/Homer News)
Opinion: Funding sustainable fisheries

Spring is always a busy season for Alaska’s fishermen and fishing communities.… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy holds a press conference on Monday, May 19, 2025, to discuss his decision to veto an education bill. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: On fiscal policy, Dunleavy is a governor in name only

His fiscal credibility is so close to zero that lawmakers have no reason to take him seriously.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Finishing a session that will make a lasting impact

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Courtesy/Chris Arend
Opinion: Protect Alaska renewable energy projects

The recently passed House budget reconciliation bill puts important projects and jobs at risk.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Choosing our priorities wisely

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.