What others say: Dire times for university sports in Alaska

  • Wednesday, August 24, 2016 4:31pm
  • Opinion

The good news for the University of Alaska as it finds its way forward amid a difficult budget situation is it has options. The bad news is all of them are unpalatable to a broad swath of Alaskans. UA President Jim Johnsen rolled out the framework of his Strategic Pathways plan last week. Though Interior residents had known its effects would be major and far-reaching, many hadn’t prepared for the reality of what the tens of millions of dollars sliced from the university budget would necessitate.

In particular, three options put forth to reduce costs in the university’s athletic departments lay bare how serious those cuts will be. Nearly all options under consideration would result in the end of the Nanooks’ most popular and successful sports teams — rifle, hockey, cross-country running and skiing.

There are three athletics options under consideration by the university. Under the first, the University of Alaska Anchorage and University of Alaska Fairbanks would end all sports. This “nuclear option” would save the university the most money — as much as 5 percent of the overall UA budget — but even the institution’s own materials laying out that plan acknowledge that it would be widely unpopular on and off campus.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

The second option would see an unprecedented combined-campus athletics approach in which each campus would retain a few sports, but one campus would be named as the “sponsoring institution.” This plan is most similar in approach to the overall design of the Strategic Pathways plan for academics — a focus on each campus’ respective strengths. In both cases, the devil is in the details. No details have been given about which campuses would be most likely to retain which sports, but it’s easy to make some inferences. It’s hard to see UAA losing basketball or volleyball, given the $110 million stadium the Legislature gifted that campus, which means those sports would likely end at UAF. There would be an easier case for UAF to keep rifle and swimming, because those programs aren’t duplicated at UAA. Hockey and cross-country running and skiing would be the big question marks. Although UAF has the more historic hockey program, the population base in Anchorage and, perhaps more importantly, the legislative power base there could spell curtains for Nanook hockey.

The third option would be for both campuses to drop to D2 status, which would mean the end of hockey, swimming, rifle and cross-country skiing, replacing them with other sports less popular (and more ill-suited climatically) in Alaska: soccer, golf and/or track. An addendum to the third option would have UAF keep its current slate of sports while only making reductions at UAA, but it’s hard to imagine that option being selected, given the Legislature’s commitment to (and, some would say, preference for) that campus. Additionally, each option that would retain more sports would save less money.

It’s an ugly scenario, but the university has been boxed into a corner by increasing costs and decreasing funding allocations from the Legislature. Some have accused the university of proposing such major cuts to athletics solely to generate public outcry, but the facts tell a different story. Simply put, athletics at the university have never been anywhere close to self-supporting. Even with ticket sales and student fees that contribute squarely to sports, programs run a deficit every year. And, unlike other schools where athletics are supported by strong alumni giving, that tradition doesn’t exist in Alaska. It’s difficult to justify major cuts to academic programs while athletics are held harmless, and the university is looking everywhere it can to save money and protect its core offerings.

The situation facing the University of Alaska isn’t a pretty one, and athletics will be only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to changes on campus. The bottom line is that where we spend our money is a reflection of our values — the days of getting things we don’t have to pay for are over. If Alaskans want athletics — or any other function — at the university to continue, we’ll have to shoulder that expense.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Aug. 19

More in Opinion

Gov. Mike Dunleavy holds a press conference on Monday, May 19, 2025, to discuss his decision to veto an education bill. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: On fiscal policy, Dunleavy is a governor in name only

His fiscal credibility is so close to zero that lawmakers have no reason to take him seriously.

Courtesy/Chris Arend
Opinion: Protect Alaska renewable energy projects

The recently passed House budget reconciliation bill puts important projects and jobs at risk.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Finishing a session that will make a lasting impact

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R-Alaska) speaks to reporters about his decision to veto an education funding bill at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The fight for Alaska’s future begins in the classroom

The fight I’ve been leading isn’t about politics — it’s about priorities.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Choosing our priorities wisely

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: As session nears end, pace picks up in Juneau

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Dick Maitland, a foley artist, works on the 46th season of “Sesame Street” at Kaufman Astoria Studios in New York, Dec. 15, 2025. (Ariana McLaughlin/The New York Times)
Opinion: Trump’s embarrassing immaturity Republicans won’t acknowledge

Sullivan should be embarrassed by the ignorance and immaturity the president is putting on display for the world to see.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The Jones Act — crass protectionism, but for whom?

Alaska is dependent on the few U.S.-built ships carrying supplies from Washington state to Alaska.

Sockeye salmon caught in a set gillnet are dragged up onto the beach at a test site for selective harvest setnet gear in Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 25, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Creating opportunities with better fishery management

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

The ranked choice outcome for Alaska’s U.S. Senate race is shown during an Alaska Public Media broadcast on Nov. 24, 2022. (Alaska Division of Elections)
Opinion: Alaska should keep ranked choice voting, but let’s make it easier

RCV has given Alaskans a better way to express their preferences.

Cook Inlet can be seen at low tide from North Kenai Beach on June 15, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Solving the Cook Inlet gas crisis

While importing LNG is necessary in the short term, the Kenai Peninsula is in dire need of a stable long-term solution.

You're browsing in private mode.
Please sign in or subscribe to continue reading articles in this mode.

Peninsula Clarion relies on subscription revenue to provide local content for our readers.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Please sign in