What others say: Deja Vu over mining mess

“The Tulsequah Chief mine missed a Canadian deadline to clean up its toxic metal pollution on Thursday.”

That was the first line of a Juneau Empire article published July 1, 2005. More than a decade later, acidic water continues to run from the mine into the Taku River.

Many Southeast Alaskans are wondering how many more years, or decades, it will take before this mining mess is cleaned up and given priority status.

We can’t blame them.

When British Columbia Minister of Energy and Mines Bill Bennett toured Southeast Alaska in August, he stopped at the site of the Tulsequah Chief mine. There was a hopeful optimism when he said the acidic runoff would at last be addressed. That optimism is waning in light of the news Tulsequah developer Chieftain Metals has defaulted on its loan.

If Chieftain can’t pay the bills, there’s little hope it can pay to clean up the toxic drainage, which has been seeping since the 1950s.

“The owner will have a responsibility to address this long-standing Fisheries Act violation and achieve compliance,” wrote a spokeswoman for Environment Canada in 2005.

Fast-forward 10 years: “(The drainage) is still something that needs to be rectified,” said Bennett during his 2015 visit.

We believe Bennett was speaking in earnest when he said the Tulsequah’s toxic drainage was troubling. We believe him when he said Alaskans’ perception of the B.C. government is harmful. Results are more comforting than intentions, however.

We’ve heard about lots of good intentions from across the border. Results, not so much. Canada hasn’t been polite when it comes to this mine.

We understand there’s no simple or quick solution, but after more than a decade of promises and pandering, it’s become increasingly difficult to believe B.C. officials.

We’re beginning to wonder if we should treat them with the skepticism we reserve for oil company spokesmen.

The company that was supposed to address acid runoff from the Tulsequah Chief mine, Redcorp Ventures, went bankrupt in 2005. In 2010, Chieftain Metals purchased the mine. One would think that six years would have resulted in more progress.

At the very least, Southeast Alaskans deserve to know the B.C. government’s next step. We must know its plan in case Chieftain Metals cannot, or will not, address the issue. At least then we’d know Bennett and others are still looking for creative solutions to a longstanding problem that has caused unnecessary discord between our two nations.

— Juneau Empire,

May 15

More in Opinion

WH
Opinion: The buck stops at the top

Shared mistakes of Dunleavy and Biden.

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Most Read