What others say: Another try for a gas line

  • By Fairbanks Daily News-Miner Editorial
  • Sunday, November 19, 2017 7:58pm
  • Opinion

Alaskans can perhaps be excused if they happen to have a muted response to Gov. Bill Walker’s signing of an agreement Thursday in Beijing regarding construction of an 800-mile natural gas pipeline from the North Slope and the sale of most of that gas to China.

Alaskans have been hearing about a North Slope natural gas pipeline for more than four decades.

Nevertheless, the agreement between the state of Alaska and Alaska Gasline Development Corp. and the government-owned petroleum company Sinopec, China Investment Corp. and the Bank of China — signed in the presence of President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping — does renew hope for this long-sought project.

The agreement is, in reality, a framework in which the parties agree to work toward the possibility of building the pipeline.

Gov. Walker touted the agreement in more definite terms, saying it “will provide” Alaska an economic boom comparable to that of the development of the oil pipeline in the 1970s.

But the caveats were clear in statements of AGDC President Keith Meyer and the official statement of Sinopec.

Mr. Meyer said the agreement “brings the potential customer, lender, equity investor, and developer together with a common objective of crafting mutually beneficial agreements leading to increased LNG trade between Alaska and China.” Note the word “potential.”

And this from Sinopec: “Sinopec is interested in the possibility of LNG purchase on a stable basis from Alaska LNG.”

The bottom line is that the parties are going to work together to see if they can get a pipeline built and gas produced in a manner that benefits all sides.

That’s good. And seeing progress of most any sort is what Alaskans should want.

But numerous questions remain and many details have yet to be worked out in the $43 billion non-binding agreement.

For example, is it smart to lock up 75 percent of the gas supply with a single customer, in this case China?

Is China just trying to play Alaska against Australia, which has sharply increased its natural gas production through several projects.

Is it, from a national perspective, wise to provide such a massive amount of a U.S. natural resource to a nation that increasingly sees itself as supplanting the U.S. as a world leader?

And, perhaps the biggest of all: Will the oil companies that hold the North Slope leases find it in their best financial interest to develop and sell the gas?

Remember, BP, Conoco Phillips and ExxonMobil haven’t shown much interest lately in developing the North Slope. It was during the administration of former Gov. Sean Parnell, whom Gov. Walker defeated in 2014, that the three companies seemed ready to build the pipeline on their own.

Back then, momentum toward a pipeline seemed great. The state government, the oil companies and pipeline builder TransCanada were all in agreement. Preliminary engineering work was underway and a decision on whether to build was set for 2019.

Gov. Parnell issued an exuberant statement stating that, “For the first time we have alignment among the necessary parties … for a project that will create thousands of jobs and provide fuel to Alaska homes and businesses for decades.”

Nothing came of it, which is why Alaskans might be skeptical of this week’s news about an agreement with China.

Even so, and although many questions remain and much work lies ahead, it is encouraging to see that Alaska officials remain committed to getting the North Slope natural gas into the market and into the hands of anxious customers.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, Nov. 12

More in Opinion

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Snow blows off Mt. Roberts high above the Thane avalanche chute, where an avalanche blew across the road during a major snowstorm. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
An Alaska winter of discontent

It’s been a hard winter throughout the state.

A Uncruise Adventures cruise ship, with a fleet of kayaks in the water behind it, in the Tongass National Forest. Uncruise, a boutique local cruise ship operator, has been vocal about the importance of the intact Tongass National Forest, or SeaBank, to its business. (Photo by Ben Hamilton/courtesy Salmon State)
Alaska Voices: The dividends paid by Southeast Alaska’s ‘Seabank’ are the state’s untold secrets

Southeast Alaska’s natural capital produces economic outputs from the seafood and visitor products industries worth several billion dollars a year

teaser
Opinion: The pulse of fealty

Let’s be honest. Trump’s demands go beyond his one stated condition.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Alaska Voices: Permanent fund integrity in peril?

Alaskans need to be kept informed of what the trustees are doing with their money.

A cast member holds up a cue card in Soldotna High School’s production of "Annie" on Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2021. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Is theater dead?

“It will not be an easy task, performing CPR on this theater, but imagine the joy that you could bring to the students.”

Bjørn Olson (Photo provided)
Point of View: Homer Drawdown moves forward with climate-change solutions

Two years ago, a small group of concerned citizens decided to use this book as a guiding document

A “Vote Here” sign is seen at the City of Kenai building on Monday, Sept. 21 in Kenai, Alaska.
Voices of the Peninsula: Fight for democracy

When the Insurrection occurred on Jan. 6, 2021, it was a direct attack on our democratic rule of law.

Most Read