What others say: 90-day session isn’t good for Alaska

  • Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:39pm
  • Opinion

Still not convinced that the 90-day legislative session is a bad idea?

House Speaker Mike Chenault, a supporter of the shorter session, offered a revealing observation in a story in Sunday’s Daily News-Miner. And it undermines his own view.

“The public process is what gets shorted by the shorter session,” the speaker said.

That should be enough to warrant a return to the 120-day session.

Don’t want to take the word of the speaker?

Then how about listening to what a lobbyist-turned-legislator had to say about the 90-day session.

Democratic Rep. Sam Kito III of Juneau was a lobbyist before being appointed to the Legislature to fill a vacancy earlier this year.

“When we’re at 90 days, we’re empowering the special interests who have people who have a lot of influence and a lot of knowledge. They can come in here and communicate very quickly to people who don’t have the time,” he said in Sunday’s story.

What more is there to say? The public doesn’t have as much time to participate in the legislative process. They lose out to the ever-present lobbyists. Bills don’t always get the thorough vetting they deserve.

When will legislative leaders have the courage to return to the 120-day session allowed under the Alaska Constitution.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner,

April 28

More in Opinion

WH
Opinion: The buck stops at the top

Shared mistakes of Dunleavy and Biden.

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Most Read