Voices of the Peninsula: Why I am voting yes on Prop 1

  • By H.S. Norwood
  • Thursday, September 14, 2017 9:33pm
  • Opinion

For 32 years I have lived in a “non-incorporated area” of the KPB, which means I do not live within the city limits of Seward, Soldotna, Kenai, or Homer. I am voting YES on Prop 1 and hope you do as well.

Beware! Prop 1 is one of those oddly worded Propositions; if you do not want the sprouting “Cannabis Cultivation Industry” to take root and expand in the non-incorporated areas, then on Oct. 3 you want to vote YES on Prop 1.

These days any opposition to the cannabis industry is immediately sidetracked by labelling the questioner a “Reefer Madness” zealot. Let me clarify that within the privacy of your home and as long as you are at least 21 years old, “smoke ‘em if you got ‘em.” Feel free to grow and enjoy the 6 plants for personal consumption allowed by state law. I am happy that those truly in need of medical marijuana shall still have their source of retail supply regardless of the outcome of the Prop 1 vote (that’s a fact that gets blurred by the Vote No lobby).

I am voting YES on Prop 1 because I prioritize environmental equality for all KPB neighborhoods, incorporated or not. The applicable environmental law phrase is “Environmental Discrimination.” Environmental discrimination is evident wherever a neighborhood near any industrial enterprise uniquely suffers the negative impacts of that industry.

For example, environmental discrimination exists when Not In My Back Yard sentiments still allow heavy industry to build in the poorest of neighborhoods. These citizens uniquely bear the long term impacts of industrial externalities yet receive a much smaller percentage of their economic benefits.

To personally experience a form of environmental discrimination, drive out to Nikiski-North Star Elementary. You will not be able to avoid a large sign that is less than a mile from the school which emphatically states its support for growing pot. The school bus routes to the local elementary and even the middle-high school can’t avoid the sign either. Note that school kids in Kenai and Soldotna are not being constantly subjected to this messaging. Shall we all be shocked in the near future when the underaged use of pot is greater in the unincorporated areas?

So why is there a big pro pot growing sign near Nikiski-North Star Elementary but there is not one near a Kenai or Soldotna school?

Naturally, the land outside of the zoned cities with all of their amenities is cheaper by the acre and more plentiful. Thus, the economies of scale for commercially growing pot greatly favor establishing cultivation in the non-incorporated areas. The finished products are then sold in the retail stores located in the more densely populated cities. This business model means we bumpkins in the sticks will endure all the risks related to commercial pot growing just so that the retail stores in the cities can have a risk-free reliable supply of pot.

What kind of risks you may ask? Answer: all of them!

Of course mass cultivation economics also apply to tomatoes that are grown on unincorporated land and then hauled into town for Saturday market. However, no restrictions on eating tomatoes before the age of 21 exist probably because there’s no research documenting the negative impact that tomato eating has on the developing human brain through age 26.

A time machine would make it possible to offer more concrete examples of the environmental discrimination that underlies Prop 1. We were family planning when we purchased our home in Nikiski. Like yourselves, our home purchase represents the biggest financial investment of our lives. We would not have bought our current home had a commercial pot enterprise been a neighbor. Otherwise stated: We would have discriminated against such a neighborhood in favor of one that could guarantee no commercial pot growers were allowed.

Zoom the time machine back to today. If Prop 1 fails there is absolutely no guarantee that a commercial pot grower won’t set up close to your non-incorporated area home if they haven’t done so already. And … Surprise! You quite feasibly won’t become aware that your neighbor is a commercial pot grower until you are ready to cash in on your main investment and encounter due diligence buyers like me.

The fact isyou don’t know what you don’t know and no official at the state or local level knows the impact of a Prop 1 failure either. What we do know is a YES on 1 vote will 100 percent eliminate the pot-growing risks that we non-incorporated residents will otherwise uniquely bear 100 percent. A YES on 1 vote will nip the environmental discrimination in the proverbial bud. That’s why I am voting YES on 1 on Oct. 3 and hope you do, too.

H.S. Norwood holds a master’s degree in public administration and is a concerned resident of Nikiski who will be impacted by the outcome of Proposition 1.

More in Opinion

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Snow blows off Mt. Roberts high above the Thane avalanche chute, where an avalanche blew across the road during a major snowstorm. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
An Alaska winter of discontent

It’s been a hard winter throughout the state.

A Uncruise Adventures cruise ship, with a fleet of kayaks in the water behind it, in the Tongass National Forest. Uncruise, a boutique local cruise ship operator, has been vocal about the importance of the intact Tongass National Forest, or SeaBank, to its business. (Photo by Ben Hamilton/courtesy Salmon State)
Alaska Voices: The dividends paid by Southeast Alaska’s ‘Seabank’ are the state’s untold secrets

Southeast Alaska’s natural capital produces economic outputs from the seafood and visitor products industries worth several billion dollars a year

teaser
Opinion: The pulse of fealty

Let’s be honest. Trump’s demands go beyond his one stated condition.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Alaska Voices: Permanent fund integrity in peril?

Alaskans need to be kept informed of what the trustees are doing with their money.

A cast member holds up a cue card in Soldotna High School’s production of "Annie" on Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2021. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Is theater dead?

“It will not be an easy task, performing CPR on this theater, but imagine the joy that you could bring to the students.”

Bjørn Olson (Photo provided)
Point of View: Homer Drawdown moves forward with climate-change solutions

Two years ago, a small group of concerned citizens decided to use this book as a guiding document

A “Vote Here” sign is seen at the City of Kenai building on Monday, Sept. 21 in Kenai, Alaska.
Voices of the Peninsula: Fight for democracy

When the Insurrection occurred on Jan. 6, 2021, it was a direct attack on our democratic rule of law.

Former Alaska legislator and gubernatorial candidate Les Gara is seen in this undated photo. (courtesy photo)
Alaska’s great oil giveway

We can do better than giving away billions in oil company subsidies