Voices of the Peninsula: Voters should consider facts, effects of ballot propositions

  • By Mike Navarre
  • Monday, September 26, 2016 9:00pm
  • Opinion

Two Kenai Borough ballot propositions in the Oct. 4 election are about sharing the responsibility for our community among taxpayers and maintaining a fair balance between property tax and sales tax.

Proposition No. 3 would raise the amount of a single purchase subject to sales tax. This is about correcting a growing reliance on property taxes and bringing the borough’s 51-year-old sales tax code closer to today’s economy.

Proposition No. 4 would phase-in over many years a reduced property tax exemption total for future senior citizens. This is about continuing to help seniors, while dealing with the reality that the senior citizen population is growing much faster than the rest of the borough population, adding more property value to the tax-exempt list every year and increasingly shifting the tax burden to non-seniors.

The sales tax proposition would raise the amount of a single transaction subject to sales tax from $500, set in 1965, to $1,000, starting Jan. 1. It also would exempt residential rent from borough sales tax. Without the change, renters would be disproportionately hurt by the taxable increase every month. Affordable rental housing is important for the borough and its residents and, as such, exempting residential rent from sales tax is consistent with that public policy goal.

The net revenue gain to the borough from those two sales tax changes is estimated at $2.9 million annually. All of that money would go to education, as required by borough code. The borough this year expects to collect about $30 million in sales taxes, which is slightly less than last year. Because the borough contribution to the school district is $48 million, property tax dollars cover what sales taxes do not.

An increasing share of borough general fund dollars is coming from property taxes — and that gap is projected to widen. This proposition would help reverse that trend. It is a reasonable step toward rebalancing tax responsibility between shoppers — locals and visitors alike — and property owners.

Another consideration is that state assistance to municipalities and schools is on the decline and expected to continue in that direction, and additional sales taxes would help the borough deal with those state cutbacks. State revenue sharing to the borough is down almost $750,000 from fiscal 2016 to 2017, with no guarantee there will be any money in the years ahead. The legislature last year called a halt to state reimbursement for new school construction debt, with no guarantee that will be restored in the years ahead.

Ballot Proposition No. 4, the senior citizen property tax issue, would not reduce the tax exemption for any senior who currently receives it or turns 65 before Jan. 1, 2018. They would continue to receive their full exemption as long as they are residents in the borough. Seniors currently are exempt from borough and service area property taxes for up to $350,000 of their home’s assessed value. That breaks down to:

• A $150,000 tax exemption required by the state. (The state used to reimburse municipalities for the cost of that mandatory exemption, but stopped in 1997.)

• A $150,000 exemption that is optional for cities and boroughs in Alaska. Currently, only the Kenai Borough and North Slope Borough provide that optional exemption. (None of the cities in the Kenai Borough adopted the optional $150,000 exemption.)

• And a $50,000 residential property exemption offered all Kenai Borough homeowners.

The Oct. 4 ballot proposition would phase out only the optional $150,000 senior exemption. Nothing else would change. The proposition would phase out that exemption in three steps for homeowners who reach age 65 on or after Jan. 1, 2018.

• Owners who turn 65 between Jan. 1, 2018, and Dec. 31, 2020, would receive a $100,000 optional exemption, for a total exemption of $300,000.

• People who turn 65 between Jan. 1, 2021, and Dec. 31, 2023, would receive a $50,000 optional exemption, for a total of $250,000.

• There would be no optional exemption for anyone who turns 65 on or after Jan. 1, 2024, and their total exemption would be $200,000.

As of this year, $815 million in senior-owned property value is exempt from borough and service area taxes, up 75 percent from 2009. That represents about 12 percent of all real property in the borough (excluding oil and gas property). The state’s latest estimates show the borough’s over-65 population increasing from 8,600 in 2015 to almost 15,000 by 2030 — close to one-quarter of the borough’s entire estimated population.

Failure to ease the growth of the senior tax exemption in the borough budget would mean an increasing shift in the tax burden to other property owners, including younger families just starting out. I believe the ballot proposition strikes a fair balance between all age groups, and gives residents time to prepare for the changes.

None of this will affect the borough’s hardship provision, which caps eligible seniors’ borough property tax bills at 2% of their household gross income. That protection is important for our most vulnerable seniors.

Whichever way you choose to vote, I ask you to exercise your right and responsibility as a borough resident to cast a ballot Oct. 4.

Mike Navarre is the mayor of the Kenai Peninsula Borough.

More in Opinion

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, a Soldotna Republican who co-chairs the House Education Committee, speaks during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Rep. Justin Ruffridge: Creating a road map to our shared future

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

An array of solar panels stand in the sunlight at Whistle Hill in Soldotna, Alaska, on Sunday, April 7, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Renewable Energy Fund: Key to Alaska’s clean economy transition

AEA will continue to strive to deliver affordable, reliable, and sustainable energy to provide a brighter future for all Alaskans.

Mount Redoubt can be seen acoss Cook Inlet from North Kenai Beach on Thursday, July 2, 2022. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: An open letter to the HEA board of directors

Renewable energy is a viable option for Alaska

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in opposition to an executive order that would abolish the Board of Certified Direct-Entry Midwives during a joint legislative session on Tuesday, March 12, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Sen. Jesse Bjorkman: Making progress, passing bills

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Priya Helweg is the deputy regional director and executive officer for the Office of the Regional Director (ORD), Office of Intergovernmental and External Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services, Region 10. (Image via hhs.gov)
Opinion: Taking action on the maternal health crisis

The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate among high-income countries

Heidi Hedberg. (Photo courtesy of the Alaska Department of Health)
Opinion: Alaska’s public assistance division is on course to serve Alaskans in need more efficiently than ever

We are now able to provide in-person service at our offices in Bethel, Juneau, Kodiak, Kenai, Homer and Wasilla

Sara Hondel (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: Alaskan advocate shines light on Alzheimer’s crisis

In the heart of the nation’s capital next week, volunteers will champion the urgent need for legislative action to support those affected by Alzheimer’s

Rep. Ben Carpenter, a Nikiski Republican, speaks during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Rep. Ben Carpenter: Clearing red tape on occupational licensing

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Most Read