Voices of the Peninsula: Maximizing moose productivity on the Kenai Peninsula

Maximum isn’t necessarily optimum, as cattle ranchers learned long ago.

  • By Stephen F. Stringham
  • Monday, March 13, 2023 9:52pm
  • Opinion
An orphaned moose calf reared by the author is seen in 1970. (Stephen F. Stringham/courtesy photo)

An orphaned moose calf reared by the author is seen in 1970. (Stephen F. Stringham/courtesy photo)

By Stephen F. Stringham

If the goal of moose management on the Kenai Peninsula is to maximize the number that can be harvested year after year for decades, then the Board of Game cannot do it by trying to maximize size of the moose population.

The moose carrying capacity of the Kenai Peninsula is defined as the maximum number of moose that can survive here, as evidenced by past numbers here or in comparable habitats elsewhere. More generally, carrying capacity is the maximum numbers of animals per 1,000 square miles — that is, the maximum population density — that a habitat can support. Historically, when the Board of Game has proposed keeping moose populations near carrying capacity, they have equated that with maximizing density.

However, maximum isn’t necessarily optimum, as cattle ranchers learned long ago.

Anyone familiar with cattle ranching knows about overgrazing: Running so many cow-calf pairs and steers that they eat their forage faster than it can regrow, damaging the plants so badly that they don’t produce as well in following years. The herd may be large, but the cattle are skinny. Unless size of the herd is reduced, the range will tend to keep deteriorating. So will the cattle themselves, increasing their vulnerability to parasites, disease, predators and foul weather. Some bad winters have killed enormous numbers of poorly nourished cattle.

Savvy ranchers eventually learned that cattle herds are most productive and most profitable when kept in balance with their food supply — not at maximum density, but at optimal density. No matter what regulations say about trying to keep moose populations at carrying capacity, the Board of Game needs to avoid interpreting that as maximum density and equate it with optimal density — which in wild hoofstock populations may be as low as 50-80% of maximum. Moose that pack on fat during summer have much better survivorship over winter, especially when deep snow minimizes the nutritional profitability of them traveling from one forage site to another.

The amount of moose food grown can be greatest in the first decades after wildfire, then decline as a forest regrows, as has happened here on the peninsula, reducing carrying capacity. Carrying capacity is determined by the amount grown, minus the amounts eaten by insects, rodents and other small herbivores. Although those critters are tiny compared to livestock, they can be far more numerous, and their metabolic rate is much higher. It takes many fold more food to support a ton of rabbits than a ton of hoofstock. In one ranching habitat, rabbits consumed 34% of forage, leaving only 66% for livestock, a one-third reduction in livestock carrying capacity. The abnormally high rabbit abundance was an unintended consequence of excessive predator control.

Although the impacts of rodents and rabbits/hares has been most dramatically recognized on ranches and farms outside Alaska, our own wildland habitats are not immune. Snowshoe hares not only compete with moose for some foods such as willow shrubs, but hares kill a lot of stems by girdling them; and their saliva allegedly causes plants to produce more toxins that impair digestion on any critter that eats them. The 1,2,3 punch delivered by hares can hit moose hard. According to rough calculations I’ve made, during peaks in snowshoe hare abundance, hares could seriously reduce moose carrying capacity of the peninsula, unless we have enough predators to keep hare numbers in check.

In order to maximize moose harvests, we need to avoid striving to maximize moose density or minimize predator density. Instead, we must strive for the optimal densities of both moose and predators. How does the abundance of bears affect numbers of wolves; and how does wolf abundance affect numbers of coyotes, lynx and foxes? At what ratios of various predator species to hares is density of moose optimized? What is their optimal carrying capacity? Determining optimal densities of moose, hares and predators is a challenge requiring considerable scientific expertise. Fortunately, Alaska hires first-class biologists. On the Kenai Peninsula, we are fortunate to have Jeff Selinger, who did a wolf-moose study in the Lower 48 before coming to Alaska. After serving for decades as area manager, he became regional coordinator.

Replacing him as area manager is Nick Fowler, an expert how on the abundance of wolves affects abundance of coyotes, which in turn affects abundance of foxes (and here, lynx) — knowledge essential for identifying the best ratios among predators for keeping hare and rodent numbers in check. We also have wildlife physiologist John Crouse, as well as wildlife biologists Dan Thompson and Jacob Pelham.

Where additional expertise is needed, they can turn to biologist Nate Svoboda on Kodiak Island, and to those in Anchorage. Our team of local Alaska Department of Fish and Game scientists is highly skilled as field biologists as well as thoroughly trained in book knowledge, computing and other technologies.

Let’s hope that when the Board of Game meets here in mid-March that they refrain from dictating to these biologists and take their expert advice on how best to maximize moose and caribou harvests on the Kenai Peninsula.

Stephen F. Stringham, PhD is a certified wildlife biologist and president of WildWatch Consulting.

More in Opinion

This image available under the Creative Commons license shows the outline of the state of Alaska filled with the pattern of the state flag.
Opinion: Old models of development are not sustainable for Alaska

Sustainability means investing in keeping Alaska as healthy as possible.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy unveils proposals to offer public school teachers annual retention bonuses and enact policies restricting discussion of sex and gender in education during a news conference in Anchorage. (Screenshot)
Opinion: As a father and a grandfather, I believe the governor’s proposed laws are anti-family

Now, the discrimination sword is pointing to our gay and transgender friends and families.

Kenai Peninsula Education Association President Nathan Erfurth works in his office on Thursday, Oct. 28, 2021, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Now is the time to invest in Kenai Peninsula students

Parents, educators and community members addressed the potential budget cuts with a clear message.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy holds a press conference at the Capitol on Tuesday, April 9, 2019. (Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: An accurate portrayal of parental rights isn’t controversial

Affirming and defining parental rights is a matter of respect for the relationship between parent and child

Opinion: When the state values bigotry over the lives of queer kids

It has been a long, difficult week for queer and trans Alaskans like me.

Dr. Sarah Spencer. (Photo by Maureen Todd and courtesy of Dr. Sarah Spencer)
Voices of the Peninsula: Let’s bring opioid addiction treatment to the Alaskans who need it most

This incredibly effective and safe medication has the potential to dramatically increase access to treatment

Unsplash / Louis Velazquez
Opinion: Fish, family and freedom… from Big Oil

“Ultimate investment in the status quo” is not what I voted for.

An orphaned moose calf reared by the author is seen in 1970. (Stephen F. Stringham/courtesy photo)
Voices of the Peninsula: Maximizing moose productivity on the Kenai Peninsula

Maximum isn’t necessarily optimum, as cattle ranchers learned long ago.

(Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The time has come to stop Eastman’s willful and wanton damage

God in the Bible makes it clear that we are to care for the vulnerable among us.

Caribou graze on the greening tundra of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeast Alaska in June, 2001. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: AIDEA’s $20 million-and-growing investment looks like a bad bet

Not producing in ANWR could probably generate a lot of money for Alaska.

A fisher holds a reel on the Kenai River near Soldotna on June 30, 2021. (Photo by Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: King salmon closures long overdue

Returns have progressively gone downhill since the early run was closed in June 2012

(Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Fixing legislative salaries and per diem

The state Senate was right to unanimously reject giving a 20% pay… Continue reading