Supreme Court decision leaves fishery regulation to fishery regulators

  • Saturday, January 2, 2016 5:40pm
  • Opinion

The Alaska Supreme Court on Thursday reversed a Superior Court decision and side with the state in determining that a ballot initiative to ban the use of setnets in urban areas of the state to be unconstitutional.

We applaud the court’s action in settling this issue.

The initiative has been particularly divisive here on the Kenai Peninsula, where commercial fishing interests — including setnetters — compete with sport and personal-use fishing interests for allocations of upper Cook Inlet salmon. Several years of weak king salmon returns have exacerbated the situation, as commercial harvest opportunity has been restricted and sport fishing limited to conserve Kenai and Kasilof river kings.

We see the court’s decision not as a victory for one side or a defeat for the other, but as an important precedent for all fishing interests when it comes to fishery allocation and regulation.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Let’s be honest, if a measure to ban one type of fishing in the name of conservation appeared on the ballot, how long would it be before another popped up? If a proposal to ban setnets was to have been determined to be constitutional, so would a proposal to ban rod-and-reel fishing over the same conservation concerns. There are enough politics in fishery management already. Management policy based on the wishes of whichever group can put together the most effective political campaign would be devastating for Alaska’s fisheries.

In its ruling, the court found that “the initiative would result in a give-away program of salmon stock from set netters to other types of fishers.”

More importantly, the court found the initiative “would significantly narrow the legislature’s and Board of Fisheries’ range of freedom to make allocation decisions.”

We have our concerns about the way the fish board process currently works, but it remains the best way to address fishery allocation, regulation and conservation issues.

There are still plenty of debates to be had about Cook Inlet fishery management — the Supreme Court’s decisions certainly didn’t change that. Various user groups around Cook Inlet have started to find common ground solutions to addressing king salmon conservation, something ballot initiative threatened.

With the initiative off the table, we hope to see those efforts continue in the coming year.

More in Opinion

Deena Bishop, commissioner of the Department of Education and Early Development, discusses the status of school districts’ finances during a press conference with Gov. Mike Dunleavy at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: The fight to improve public education has just begun

We owe our children more than what the system is currently offering

President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia at a joint news conference in Helsinki, Finland, July 16, 2018. (Doug Mills/The New York Times file photo)
Opinion: Mistaking flattery for respect

Flattery played a role in Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill.

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Life is harder when you outlive your support group

Long-time friends are more important than ever to help us cope, to remind us we are not alone and that others feel the same way.

Deven Mitchell is the executive director and chief executive officer of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. (Photo courtesy of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp.)
Opinion: The key to a stronger fund: Diversification

Diversification is a means of stabilizing returns and mitigating risk.

A silver salmon is weighed at Three Bears in Kenai, Alaska. Evelyn McCoy, customer service PIC at Three Bears, looks on. (Photo by Jeff Helminiak/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Will coho salmon be the next to disappear in the Kenai River?

Did we not learn anything from the disappearance of the kings from the Kenai River?

Jonathan Flora is a lifelong commercial fisherman and dockworker from Homer, Alaska.
Point of View: Not fishing for favors — Alaskans need basic health care access

We ask our elected officials to oppose this bill that puts our health and livelihoods in danger.

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: Public schools do much more than just teach the three Rs

Isn’t it worth spending the money to provide a quality education for each student that enters our schools?

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to reporters at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter to the Editor: Law enforcement officers helped ensure smooth, secure energy conference

Their visible commitment to public safety allowed attendees to focus fully on collaboration, learning, and the important conversations shaping our path forward.

Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo
The present-day KTOO public broadcasting building, built in 1959 for the U.S. Army’s Alaska Communications System Signal Corps, is located on filled tidelands near Juneau’s subport. Today vehicles on Egan Drive pass by the concrete structure with satellite dishes on the roof that receive signals from NPR, PBS and other sources.
My Turn: Stand for the community radio, not culture war optics

Alaskans are different and we pride ourselves on that. If my vehicle… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) delivers his annual speech to the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, March 20, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Sullivan, Trump and the rule of lawlessness

In September 2023, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan established his own Alaska Federal… Continue reading

UAA Provost Denise Runge photographed outside the Administration and Humanities Building at the University of Alaskas Anchorage. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: UAA’s College of Health — Empowering Alaska’s future, one nurse at a time

At the University of Alaska Anchorage, we understand the health of our… Continue reading

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, address a joint session of the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: A noncongressman for Alaska?

It’s right to ask whether Nick Begich is a noncongressman for Alaska.… Continue reading

You're browsing in private mode.
Please sign in or subscribe to continue reading articles in this mode.

Peninsula Clarion relies on subscription revenue to provide local content for our readers.

Subscribe

Already a subscriber? Please sign in