SJR3 an attack on Alaska judges, the Judiciary Council and judicial selection procedures

  • By Barbara McDaniel
  • Saturday, February 28, 2015 8:32pm
  • Opinion

Fairbanks Sen. Pete Kelly wants to change the Constitution of the State of Alaska, the section on judicial candidate appointment procedures. Senate Joint Resolution 3 (SJR3) will double the number of at-large, non-attorneys on the Alaska Judicial Council from three to six, but maintain the number of attorneys at three, and then require a majority vote to break a tie rather than a vote from the Chief Justice of the Alaska Supreme Court. Alaskans need to reject SJR3.

In his Jan. 29 commentary, Sen. Kelly posed a secular argument supporting SJR3 while denying widely-held suspicions that he and Jim Minnery of Alaska Family Action (AFA) are pushing the amendment hard, hoping to make Alaska’s courts more vulnerable to AFA’s radical, ideological influence. At a Feb. 19 televised committee hearing, Sen. Kelly presented three non-ideological arguments to justify an urgent need to amend this section of Alaska’s constitution:

— The council needs more rural members. Sen. Kelly failed to show how doubling the number of at-large members is necessary to accomplish this goal. This argument is not relevant to the amendment because the existing language covers “due consideration to area representation” and no language related to rural members was changed or added to the amendment.

— The legislature should confirm the attorneys appointed to the Alaska Judicial Council. This debatable argument is too insignificant to necessitate the amendment and is not relevant to SJR3’s most dubious and primary element: doubling only the number of at-large, non-legal- scholars on the council.

— The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is an attorney and therefore a conflict of interest exists when she breaks a tie vote. Sen. Kelly wondered why more tie-votes between attorneys and at-large members were decided in favor of the attorneys in recent years. But he offered no explanation as to why that happened or how SJR3 could reduce such occurrences. While proving nothing, his question suggests that, despite our Chief Justice’s widely-respected expertise and documented outstanding record of appropriate decisions, she should not be trusted to evaluate and vote for or against an attorney who is a judicial candidate. Jim Minnery and AFA’s past attacks against retention of her and another judge should be seriously considered when evaluating the amendment’s merits and its sponsors’ motives.

In a recently published article supporting the amendment, Mr. Minnery also poses as a man motivated by secular reasoning. That is incredible as Mr. Minnery consistently presents himself as a religious-political activist who lives and breathes AFA’s hetero-patriarchal mission. That is, to change our laws, procedures, and regulations in order to inflict AFA’s beliefs regarding sexual relationships and behaviors and related education and services upon all Alaskans.

Mr. Minnery and his AFA group indicate they want our courts to support the sex-related beliefs and legal agenda they relentlessly postulate: Men may only sodomize women and vice versa. Sexual naiveté is good for youth, and public schools must not provide effective, age-appropriate sex education. The government must compel women to bear children against their will. Women with low incomes must not receive public assistance for affordable, accessible contraceptives. The Affordable Care Act must not provide comprehensive reproductive health care for women and men.

Notably, the AFA agenda omits ending physical violence and sexual assault against women. Apparently these epidemics are of little interest to AFA.

AFA evidently cooked up SJR3 and, along with Sen. Kelly, presented feigned, secular arguments of support in order to cover up AFA’s radical, ideological itch to gain influence over Alaska’s judiciary branch. AFA’s posed arguments do not adequately support amending Article IV Section 8 of the Alaska Constitution and neither does their ideology. Our existing judicial selection process, well-functioning since statehood, provides us a reasonable, non-ideological process reliant on reason, facts, legal expertise, and high legal standards to maintain a high-quality judiciary for all citizens. Alaskans must reject SJR3 and effectively maintain the existing, higher-standards of procedure for judicial selection in Alaska.

Barbara McDaniel is a life-long Alaskan resident and President of the Alaska National Organization for Women.

More in Opinion

This screenshot of an Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation map of PFAS sites in Alaska shows that contamination from so-called “forever chemicals” is observable throughout the state. (Screenshot | Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation)
Opinion: More action must be taken on PFAS

Toxic forever chemicals present in high concentrations in Nikishka Bay Utility Water Supply

Logo courtesy of League of Women Voters.
League of Women Voters of Alaska: Join us in calling for campaign finance limits

The involvement of money in our elections is a huge barrier for everyday Alaskans who run for public office

Promise garden flowers are assembled for the Walk to End Alzheimer’s at the Soldotna Regional Sports Complex in Soldotna, Alaska, on Saturday, Sept. 16, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Let’s keep momentum in the fight against Alzheimer’s

It’s time to reauthorize these bills to keep up our momentum in the fight to end Alzheimer’s and all other types of Dementia.

Jacquelyn Martin / Associated Press
Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., questions Navy Adm. Lisa Franchetti during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Sept. 14 on Capitol Hill.
Opinion: Music to the ears of America’s adversaries

Russia and China have interest in seeing America’s democracy and standing in the world weakened

Dr. Sarah Spencer. (Photo by Maureen Todd and courtesy of Dr. Sarah Spencer)
Opinion: Alaskans needs better access to addiction treatment. Telehealth can help.

I have witnessed firsthand the struggles patients face in accessing addiction care

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Need for accounting and legislative oversight of the permanent fund

There is a growing threat to the permanent fund, and it is coming from the trustees themselves

(Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Imagine the cost of health and happiness if set by prescription drug companies

If you didn’t have heartburn before seeing the price, you will soon — and that requires another prescription

Mike Arnold testifies in opposition to the use of calcium chloride by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities on Kenai Peninsula roads during a Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2023, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Kenai Peninsula Votes: Civic actions that carried weight

Watching an impressive display of testimony, going to an event, or one post, can help so many people learn about something they were not even aware of

The Kasilof River is seen from the Kasilof River Recreation Area, July 30, 2019, in Kasilof, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Helicopter fishing a detriment to fish and fishers

Proposal would prohibit helicopter transport for anglers on southern peninsula

The cover of the October 2023 edition of Alaska Economic Trends magazine, a product of the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development. (Image via department website)
Dunleavy administration’s muzzling of teacher pay report is troubling

Alaska Economic Trends is recognized both in Alaska and nationally as an essential tool for understanding Alaska’s unique economy

Image via
5 tips for creating a culture of caring in our high schools

Our message: No matter what challenges you’re facing, we see you. We support you. And we’re here for you.

The Alaska State Capitol is photographed in Juneau, Alaska. (Clarise Larson/Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Vance’s bill misguided approach to Middle East crisis

In arguing for her legislation, Vance offers a simplistic, one-dimensional understanding of the conflict