PFD vote takes another option off the table

  • By Peninsula Clarion Editorial
  • Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:47pm
  • Opinion

We’d call it one step forward and two steps back, except we’re not sure there was a step forward in the first place.

On Wednesday, the Alaska House of Representatives voted to undo any progress being made toward a solution to the state’s fiscal woes by increasing the Permanent Fund Dividend to $2,200. Many House members — 26 of them, to be exact — have come to the conclusion that a long-term fiscal plan isn’t going to happen this session, and are abandoning their earlier measure to cap dividends at $1,250 and use some of the Permanent Fund’s earnings to pay for state government.

While the House’s action would also need to approved by the Senate and signed by Gov. Bill Walker — who, don’t forget, vetoed half the funding the Legislature had allocated for dividends in a failed effort to force lawmakers to come up with a solution last year — should Alaskans actually find themselves the recipients of a $2,200 PFD, we’d offer this advice: put it in the bank and make it last as long as possible, because you’re not going to see one like it again.

If lawmakers decide they’re hopelessly deadlocked, they can, with a two-thirds vote, draw on the Constitutional Budget Reserve for one more year to cover the cost of state government.

Then it’s all but gone, and the only pot of money big enough to cover a $3 billion hole will be the Permanent Fund earnings reserve — the same account from which money to pay dividends is allocated.

The Senate’s version of the budget also would use Permanent Fund earnings and does have a deficit, but if the Constitutional Budget Reserve is gone, that means either a greater draw on Permanent Fund earnings — and therefore, an even smaller dividend — or even deeper cuts to state services, which so many people advocate for but so few seem to be able to come up with ones we can live with.

The House plan includes an income tax, which the Senate will not pass. If the House continues to push that idea, we will find ourselves in the same position next year — with no Constitutional Budget Reserve to draw on — and again, we’ll be looking at the Permanent Fund earnings to cover the cost of government.

Both bodies agree that restructuring Permanent Fund to use earnings to pay for government is the biggest and most crucial part of fixing Alaska’s revenue stream. Yet, with the special session called by Gov. Walker ending today, it appears that we are no closer — not even one step — toward a solution.

So, when that check hits your bank account next fall, however big it is, savor it, because the current Legislature is leaving future ones with no other options.

More in Opinion

Jackson Carney of Wrangell, a student in the Federal Subsistence Board Policy and Procedures class at the University of Alaska Southeast, testifies before the Federal Subsistence Board. (Photo by Ryan Morse/courtesy)
Point of View: Helping the next generation of hunters and fishermen to have a say

Ultimately, the goal is to ensure Alaskans, and young people, have a say in the decisions that affect them.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024 (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Failure of HB 69 takes us back to square one

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Beach seine nets are pulled from the waters of Cook Inlet at a test site for the gear near Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 30, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Expand the set beach seine experiment

A path forward to resolve the Upper Cook Inlet King and sockeye salmon commercial fishing and conservation crisis.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: When politics win, our schools lose

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

courtesy
Opinion: To prevent abuse and neglect, support child care providers

Quality, affordable child care makes society function.

Logo courtesy of League of Women Voters.
Point of View: Tell your representatives SAVE Act is not needed

The SAVE Act will disenfranchise Alaska voters and make the process of voting much more restrictive.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024 (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Taking steps toward a balanced budget

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Dedicated to doing the work on education

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks at a town hall meeting in the Moose Pass Sportsman’s Club in Moose Pass, Alaska, on Friday, Feb. 28, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)

Most Read