Letters to the editor

  • Saturday, November 1, 2014 5:01pm
  • Opinion

Once again we have senator Murkowski talking as though she actually knows about the subject she is addressing. Has she actually had cancer, or other diseases where appetite is affected, and tried marijuana to see if it helps or not? If not, how does she know? And before the “I don’t need to jump off the cliff to know it’s bad” adage, I submit that even though I don’t have diabetes, if someone tells me that insulin helps why should I disbelieve them? Because it’s not addictive? What about the ritilan we give our kids for being overactive (it’s an addictive stimulant), are giving it to them to get high and have a good time. Of course not, and I would get nothing but indignation to make that claim. What about the people who are legally getting oxycontin for terrible pain, are they just trying to get high? Why is the bar set so high for marijuana? No other medicine has to cure the world and make you feel better too in order to pass the test. Nobody is advocating consuming it to figure out the big questions in life; just to relieve certain types of pain, and restore appetite (which, since I have had lymphoma I can say really does help the appetite, whereas the drugs they give you for chemo are certainly on the destructive side).

It’s like the horrible health care law. How dare anyone try to make it easier to get treatment. This is America, by God. We can take care of ourselves, and when it’s time to die we go sit under the tree. That’ what “free” people do. We can suffer with dignity while we throw up and finally end the whole thing with whatever pride we have remaining. People say “I think I’ll have a shot of brandy to warm up.” First of all, it doesn’t warm you up — and you’re just probably trying to find an excuse to get stinkin’ drunk!

Neil Robinson


I don’t generally vote based on a single-issue, however in this election, that’s is all I need to make my decision. One radio ad in the swarming buzz of political overload rings true. “I trust salmon.” We trust the fish to return annually to provide income and food for the winter. They are the backbone of the Alaskan coastal economy yet, they have no voice of their own in the political process, instead are taken for granted to be there when we need them. Therefore, the fish must rely on us, all those who use the resource for subsistence, sport and commercial, to make this election count.

I am putting my faith in Walker and Mallot to do what is best for the salmon. I trust this bipartisan team is on salmon’s side because they oppose Pebble Mine being built in Bristol Bay, clearly seeing such a project is bad for fishing jobs, bad for Alaska, and threatens a magical and sustaining resource. Walker has also made it clear that he will to listen to the fishermen and appoint a location for the Board of Fish meetings that we can all agree on and participate in.

Gov. Parnell has a different idea about the salmon and Pebble Mine. He has issued countless permits for mine exploration in Bristol Bay and even appointed a former spokesperson from Pebble to be his fisheries advisor, with no fishing experience! Remember his attempt to ‘Silence Alaskans’ by pushing House Bill 77? Now, a recently leaked video shows Parnell helping Northern Dynasty seek new partners after Anglo-America stepped out. That’s not siding with salmon; it’s anti-salmon!

Begich and Sullivan have also faced salmon fueled debates. Recently, they faced off at the Alaska Federation of Natives Convention, when asked if they supported the development of the Pebble Mine, Begich answered no, while Sullivan’s “I support the process” response got boos. Sullivan has growing laundry list of anti-salmon behavior. As DNR Commissioner he also granted Pebble permit after permit, pushed House Bill 77, and was a key player in the lawsuit against iconic Alaskans Vic Fischer and Bella Hammond. In Washington D.C. he lobbied for GMO salmon (Frankenfish)! That is so anti-salmon, the fish couldn’t find a stinkier flounder to be their representative!

The race for congress is no less polarized when it comes to fish. Forest Dunbar has built his campaign around being a strong opponent of Pebble and vows to undo Young’s measures to promote mining in Bristol Bay. Young has been highly critical of the EPA’s involvement, to the extent of being “embarrassing” at times.

When you’re up to your gills with all the political propaganda you just want to scream, “I’m staying home Tuesday!”, remember, it is up to us to vote for the salmon. If fish could vote, 100 percent of the salmon would vote for Walker, Begich, and Dunbar. They would mark ‘Yes’ on Proposition 4, one more layer of protection for this valuable resource is one small step for man but a giant leap for the fish. We need the salmon; they need us. Please vote.

Monica Zappa


More in Opinion

The official ballot for the Aug. 16, 2022, Special General Election features ranked choice voting. (State of Alaska Division of Elections)
Voices of the Peninsula: Check out the ballot before you vote

This kind of ballot is not something you have seen before.

Former Gov. Bill Walker, right, and his running mate former commissioner of the Department of Labor and Workforce Development Heidi Drygas, speak to Juneauites gathered for a fundraiser at a private home in Juneau on Tuesday, June 7, 2022. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Why I’m voting for Walker

Walker is the only candidate with the potential to govern effectively for all Alaskans.

Nick Begich III campaign materials sit on tables ahead of a May 16 GOP debate held in Juneau. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Nick Begich is who Alaska and America need now

It is in Alaska’s best interest to elect a member of the Republican party

Michael Heimbuch attends a memorial service for the late Drew Scalzi on Aug. 5, 2005, at the Seafarers Memorial on the Homer Spit in Homer, Alaska. (Photo by Michael Armstrong/Homer News)
Point of View: King salmon: The clash of culture and science

People do some pretty awful things to king salmon stocks

State Sen. Josh Revak (Photo provided)
The time has come to end Big Tech’s rule

The hope is that the bipartisan American Innovation and Choice Online Act (S. 2992) will come to the Senate floor for a vote

Lieutenant governor candidate Edie Grunwald speaks at a Charlie Pierce campaign event at Paradisos restaurant in Kenai on Saturday, March 5, 2022. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Election Integrity: An Alaskan question with an Alaskan answer

A needless round of feel-good meetings and what-if conversations will be a thing of the past

This photo shows the University of Alaska Southeast campus in Juneau. (Jonson Kuhn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: I’m a longtime educator, and I’m supporting Walker/Drygas

The issues our state faces are significant with regard to education.

Larry Persily (Peninsula Clarion file)
Opinion: Congress could keep health insurance costs from rising, but it has to act fast

The cost of health insurance will rise substantially next year for about 13 million Americans

The offical ballot for the Aug. 16, 2022, Special General Election features ranked choice voting. (State of Alaska Divison of Elections)
Opinion: Alaskans deserve an election system that represents our differences

The new system’s goal is to make this election cycle transparent, secure and easy for all Alaskans to vote

UAA Chancellor Sean Parnell (Courtesy)
Opinion: UAA’s career certificates are helping to fill Alaska’s workforce pipeline

At UAA, we are announcing a new suite of certificate programs responding to some of the state’s most critical needs

Opinion: Remaining vigilant after 30 years

Exxon Valdez spurred both federal and state legislatures, the industry, and the public to come together