If Seattle doesn’t want Shell, head north to the future

  • Tuesday, June 2, 2015 4:48pm
  • Opinion

On May 25, a woman hanging on the anchor chain of an oil-drilling support ship finally left her post of protest with the assistance of the U.S. Coast Guard.

The fact is, if Alaskans thought standing on an anchor chain was enough to convince Shell to leave Seattle, flights south would be booked solid. We suspect they’d have a different goal than student activist Chiara D’Angelo.

Alaska’s economy is tied to oil. Directly (through oilfield jobs) and indirectly (through government jobs paid for with oil taxes), Alaskans benefit from oil. Oil is a means to an end. We need to drill for it and produce it to maintain our standard of living.

It isn’t risk-free — anyone who lived through the Exxon Valdez oil spill or saw the Kulluk aground on Kodiak Island knows this. But this state long ago decided that oil was worth the risk. The drilling takes place in our back yards (in the case of North Slope residents, their front yards), and we’ve come to accept that.

When we see Outside protesters blockading Shell drill ships in Seattle, we’re put on edge. They’re protesting drilling, but if those protests are successful, the effects will be felt on Alaska’s tables. It’s difficult to be alarmed by abstract concerns when your job, your pay, your family’s livelihood is threatened.

If Shell is having a hard time in Seattle, we see no reason why it shouldn’t simply pack up and head north. Alaskans understand the pros and cons of drilling, and we’ve come to accept it.

Set up shop in Dutch Harbor if you need a deepwater port. Don’t have enough facilities shoreside? Ketchikan or Seward have marine terminals that might work.

Alaska wants the business. If Seattle balks, the doors should stay open here.

— Juneau Empire,

May 27

More in Opinion

William Marley’s proposal for a bayfront park on the Sterling Highway. (Illustration provided)
Point of View: Some alternatives for a community center

Entering the City of Homer from Bluff Point has to be one of the most pristine view experiences of geography and nature, ever.

Alan Parks is a Homer resident and commercial fisher. (Courtesy photo)
Voices of the Peninsula: HB 52 would hurt commercial fishing and community

Upper Cook Inlet fishing families have been hit hard by ongoing politics

WH
Opinion: The buck stops at the top

Shared mistakes of Dunleavy and Biden.

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

Most Read