Hunting rules should be adopted

  • Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:41am
  • Opinion

The Humane Society of the United States recently commissioned a five-question survey concerning a proposed change to hunting rules in Alaska, then released a statement saying the majority of Alaskans and the majority of Americans oppose these hunting rule changes. Once again, a special interest group from Outside is trying to influence policy in Alaska. And once again, a special interest group fails to understand Alaska.

The National Park Service is proposing a reversal of 2015 hunting rules in Alaska’s national preserves — not to be confused with national park land — a reversal which would ultimately realign the hunting rules on these federal lands with those rules in place on state hunting lands. Preserves are similar to national parks in that they are designed to protect the natural resources within. However, preserves are less restrictive with regards to resource extraction. Hunting, trapping and oil and gas development can be permitted in a national preserve. Preserves are often used as a conservation buffer zone near national parks or national monuments. Should the proposed rule changes be implemented, the following hunting practices would be allowed in Alaska’s national preserves:

. Taking a black bear, including cubs and sows with cubs, in their dens while using an artificial light;

. Using bait to attract then harvest black and brown bears;

. Taking wolves and coyotes, including pups, during the denning season;

. Taking swimming caribou, including hunting caribou from motorboats;

. Using dogs to hunt black bears.

At first glance, these hunting practices may be seem unsporting or even inhumane. So, when survey participants were asked questions such as “Do you support or oppose a new proposal to again allow the killing of swimming caribou, including with motor-powered boats, on National Preserves in Alaska?” it’s not surprising that 75 percent of respondents said “oppose” while only 22 percent were in favor of the practice.

It might surprise people to know that these practices, such as hunting a bear and her cubs in a den and hunting swimming caribou, have been practiced for time immemorial by Alaska’s inhabitants. Hunting a swimming caribou is efficient. Taking a bear and her cubs in winter provides access to fresh meat when game is scarce. Living a subsistence lifestyle is not a game. It’s not about sport, it’s about survival.

In fall 2017, while debating the issue of taking bears in their dens at an Alaska Board of Game meeting, Arnold Demoski, of Nulato, said, “Eliminating a longstanding customary and traditional harvesting practice is wrong. Taking away a food source is wrong. This traditional knowledge has been passed on for generations and generations. . Our ancestors have had a very strong connection with animals and we still do to this day. We do not disrespect any animals of any kind.”

All of these proposed hunting methods are already allowed on state lands. Only bear baiting is commonly practiced throughout the state. The other hunting practices are used on a very small scale, mostly by people living in rural areas who live a subsistence lifestyle.

To believe that Alaska is going to see a spike in bear sows and their cubs being hunted in their dens or an increase in any of these hunting practices, if this rule change is applied, is folly. Under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, the state was given the right to manage fish and wildlife on the millions of acres of federal lands in Alaska. Allowing the rule change to be applied is the right thing to do under ANILCA. And the state has done a better job of managing its wildlife for a sustainable yield — as mandated by the Alaska Constitution — than any government in the Lower 48. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game will continue to do so should the rule change go into effect. Allowing these hunting practices on the national preserves will have a negligible impact on animal populations.

No doubt, these animals — bears, wolves and caribou — have value in just being alive. No doubt, these animals attract tourists to Alaska who spend millions of dollars here each year. But these animals also have value in their meat, fur and bones to the Alaskans who choose to hunt them. Prohibiting these hunting practices on national preserves tramples on the state’s right to manage its wildlife.

—Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, July 15, 2018

More in Opinion

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: Public schools do much more than just teach the three Rs

Isn’t it worth spending the money to provide a quality education for each student that enters our schools?

Gov. Mike Dunleavy speaks to reporters at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Letter to the Editor: Law enforcement officers helped ensure smooth, secure energy conference

Their visible commitment to public safety allowed attendees to focus fully on collaboration, learning, and the important conversations shaping our path forward.

Laurie Craig / Juneau Empire file photo
The present-day KTOO public broadcasting building, built in 1959 for the U.S. Army’s Alaska Communications System Signal Corps, is located on filled tidelands near Juneau’s subport. Today vehicles on Egan Drive pass by the concrete structure with satellite dishes on the roof that receive signals from NPR, PBS and other sources.
My Turn: Stand for the community radio, not culture war optics

Alaskans are different and we pride ourselves on that. If my vehicle… Continue reading

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) delivers his annual speech to the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, March 20, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Sullivan, Trump and the rule of lawlessness

In September 2023, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan established his own Alaska Federal… Continue reading

UAA Provost Denise Runge photographed outside the Administration and Humanities Building at the University of Alaskas Anchorage. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: UAA’s College of Health — Empowering Alaska’s future, one nurse at a time

At the University of Alaska Anchorage, we understand the health of our… Continue reading

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, address a joint session of the Alaska Legislature on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: A noncongressman for Alaska?

It’s right to ask whether Nick Begich is a noncongressman for Alaska.… Continue reading

Boats return to the Homer Harbor at the end of the fishing period for the 30th annual Winter King Salmon Tournament on Saturday, March 23, 2024 in Homer, Alaska. (Delcenia Cosman/Homer News)
Opinion: Funding sustainable fisheries

Spring is always a busy season for Alaska’s fishermen and fishing communities.… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy holds a press conference on Monday, May 19, 2025, to discuss his decision to veto an education bill. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: On fiscal policy, Dunleavy is a governor in name only

His fiscal credibility is so close to zero that lawmakers have no reason to take him seriously.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Finishing a session that will make a lasting impact

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Courtesy/Chris Arend
Opinion: Protect Alaska renewable energy projects

The recently passed House budget reconciliation bill puts important projects and jobs at risk.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Choosing our priorities wisely

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.