Fish board snubs peninsula again

  • Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:22pm
  • Opinion

We know, life isn’t fair. Why should we expect Board of Fisheries politics to be any different?

The fish board on Monday voted 5-2 to keep the 2017 Upper Cook Inlet meeting — the one where the vast majority of proposals revolve around the Kenai and Kasilof rivers and associated fisheries — in Anchorage. The board, which takes up Upper Cook Inlet issues on a three-year cycle, hasn’t met on the central Kenai Peninsula since 1999.

That two board members, Sue Jeffrey and Fritz Johnson, voted in favor of moving the meeting to the peninsula, is progress.

But with the decision to keep the meeting in Anchorage, the board effectively voted to limit access to the board process for Kenai Peninsula residents.

According to reporting by the Alaska Journal of Commerce, board members listed fears of influence peddling, political perceptions, security, convenience and fairness — as if we’re to believe that none of those issues exist with an Anchorage meeting location.

Board members called Anchorage the center of the Upper Cook Inlet area, ignoring the fact that the Kenai Peninsula is the epicenter of Cook Inlet fishing.

And board members said an Anchorage location would be fair to a majority of users, with board member John Jensen saying “user groups don’t have to spend that much time up here. If they have to come up for one part of the meeting, they know where it is.”

Of course, the problem with that logic is that the board has a history of introducing and approving controversial proposals long after people who can only attend part of the two-week meeting have come and gone.

As for being fair to a majority of users, that sentiment represents an even bigger problem. The majority of users in the Anchorage and Mat-Su regions — people who can commute to a fish board meeting on a daily basis — are sport- and personal-use fishery participants. How is holding a meeting where one user group has better access than another fair? What about being fair to the area where the majority of use happens?

And let’s be honest — by the time the fish board enters its second week, the only people attending from any user group are the ones who are being paid to be there, and the ones who can’t afford not to be there.

We’re not asking that every Upper Cook Inlet meeting be on the Kenai Peninsula. While it would be nice for all Kenai Peninsula residents who have an interest in fish policy, we realize it wouldn’t be fair. Every other cycle would certainly be a reasonable compromise.

But to never have a fish board meeting here? Now that’s unfair.

More in Opinion

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Snow blows off Mt. Roberts high above the Thane avalanche chute, where an avalanche blew across the road during a major snowstorm. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
An Alaska winter of discontent

It’s been a hard winter throughout the state.

Most Read