The Kenai River flows into Skilak Lake, as seen on a traverse from Fuller Lakes Trail to Skyline Trail on Sunday, July 1, 2018. (Photo by Jeff Helminiak/Peninsula Clarion)

The Kenai River flows into Skilak Lake, as seen on a traverse from Fuller Lakes Trail to Skyline Trail on Sunday, July 1, 2018. (Photo by Jeff Helminiak/Peninsula Clarion)

Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 will be disastrous for outdoor enthusiasts

Alaskans love to hunt and fish. A quick glance at any Alaskans’ social media feed in the fall, with all the photos of harvested moose, caribou, ducks, and fish is proof of that. It’s the reason many of us live here.

Unfortunately, that way of life is under attack. As written, Ballot Measure 1 works to restrict Alaskan outdoor enthusiasts’ access to lands and waters. The measure was written by environmental activists who would love nothing more than to make hunting, shooting, and trapping in Alaska more difficult, if not impossible.

Ballot Measure 1 supporters claim to want to protect fish habitat. Sounds good on its face; who doesn’t want to protect the fish we all love? Unfortunately for the environmental activists pushing this thing, we outdoor folks are naturally suspicious when it comes to “Ballot Box Biology.” So, we dug into the issue, and quickly figured out how deceptive it really is.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Here’s how Ballot Measure 1 could impact anyone interested in hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation:

Ballot Measure 1 creates new minor individual permits and imposes a new process for general permits (common use and public interest permits). Under the measure, nearly all waters in Alaska are presumed to be important fish habitat until proven otherwise. Never mind if the stream or lake hasn’t seen a salmon in 40 years; now it is assumed to be fish habitat, an assumption that will be difficult and expensive to disprove.

Many areas and outdoor activities would be subject to new permitting criteria, public comment periods, public meetings, and increased potential for lawsuits by Outside environmental groups. Areas and activities potentially affected:Nearly all waters in Alaska, potentially including coastal marine waters

Landing small planes on lakes, river beds, and along the coast of Alaska

Crossing streams, rivers, or lakes in boats or all-terrain vehicles

Access to boat launches, docks, river banks, and Special Areas

Any onshore activity that affects areas in close proximity to waters that may have fish

For general permits, Ballot Measure 1 requires:A 30-day public comment period

At least one public hearing, if requested by an “interested person” (the “interested person” is not required to live in Alaska)

Opportunity for any “interested person,” including Outside groups like PETA, Sierra Club, and the Center for Biological Diversity, etc., to challenge every decision and every permit, and then appeal to the Superior Court.

Make no mistake, Ballot Measure 1 will be disastrous for anglers, hunters and trappers.

Trying to get a permit for even the most basic outdoors activity will become complex, risky, expensive, and time-consuming. Alaska’s great outdoors could quickly become tangled in a web of red tape and litigation. This is not an exaggeration; the ballot measure’s language is clear (see sections 2, 3, 6 and 8).

The added restrictions, burdens, and costs under these permits directly impact the lives and outdoor activities of individual Alaskans — not companies or businesses. These minor individual and general permits restrict the ability of Alaskans to quickly access lands and waters for recreation, hunting, fishing, camping, and other outdoor activities.

We know this sounds crazy. How could something this radical ever make it to the ballot? Good question. It’s hard to believe something this restrictive is actually up for a vote in a state like Alaska. Like it or not, whether you hunt, fish, camp, hike, or recreate in the great outdoors, Ballot Measure 1 is bad for Alaska, and even worse for Alaskans.

All Alaskans, especially sportsmen should loudly and clearly say no to Ballot Box Biology — Vote No on 1 on Nov. 6.

Contributed by John Sturgeon, Governor’s Conservationist of the Year Award Recipient; Craig Compeau; Rick Rydell, Frank and Sue Entsminger, 2014 Governor’s Conservationist of the Year Award Recipients; Kevin Kehoe; and Eddie Grasser, 2012 Governor’s Conservationist of the Year Award Recipient.

More in Opinion

Boats return to the Homer Harbor at the end of the fishing period for the 30th annual Winter King Salmon Tournament on Saturday, March 23, 2024 in Homer, Alaska. (Delcenia Cosman/Homer News)
Opinion: Funding sustainable fisheries

Spring is always a busy season for Alaska’s fishermen and fishing communities.… Continue reading

Gov. Mike Dunleavy holds a press conference on Monday, May 19, 2025, to discuss his decision to veto an education bill. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: On fiscal policy, Dunleavy is a governor in name only

His fiscal credibility is so close to zero that lawmakers have no reason to take him seriously.

Courtesy/Chris Arend
Opinion: Protect Alaska renewable energy projects

The recently passed House budget reconciliation bill puts important projects and jobs at risk.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Finishing a session that will make a lasting impact

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R-Alaska) speaks to reporters about his decision to veto an education funding bill at the Alaska State Capitol on Thursday, April 17, 2025. (Jasz Garrett / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: The fight for Alaska’s future begins in the classroom

The fight I’ve been leading isn’t about politics — it’s about priorities.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Choosing our priorities wisely

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: As session nears end, pace picks up in Juneau

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Dick Maitland, a foley artist, works on the 46th season of “Sesame Street” at Kaufman Astoria Studios in New York, Dec. 15, 2025. (Ariana McLaughlin/The New York Times)
Opinion: Trump’s embarrassing immaturity Republicans won’t acknowledge

Sullivan should be embarrassed by the ignorance and immaturity the president is putting on display for the world to see.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The Jones Act — crass protectionism, but for whom?

Alaska is dependent on the few U.S.-built ships carrying supplies from Washington state to Alaska.

Sockeye salmon caught in a set gillnet are dragged up onto the beach at a test site for selective harvest setnet gear in Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 25, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Creating opportunities with better fishery management

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

The ranked choice outcome for Alaska’s U.S. Senate race is shown during an Alaska Public Media broadcast on Nov. 24, 2022. (Alaska Division of Elections)
Opinion: Alaska should keep ranked choice voting, but let’s make it easier

RCV has given Alaskans a better way to express their preferences.