A tax is a tax, even on cigarettes

When discussing the proposed huge hike in the tax on cigarettes, remember that a tax is a tax.

Backers of a plan to increase the cigarette tax by $2 a pack announced Monday they had enough signatures to qualify the proposal for the Nov. 8 ballot. Their argument is the same as ever. Raise the tax high enough so people won’t smoke, but yet people do continue to smoke. It is a feel-good measure, unless you smoke. “Tax the poor smokers and maybe they will quit” is a popular refrain with non-smokers. “We can use the money for research and anti-smoking campaigns” is also popular, yet all the tax increases across the nation — and there have been plenty on tobacco — have not resulted in a cure for cancer nor a significant reduction in smoking as promised by the campaigns.

Today, the average cost of a pack of cigarettes in the Golden State is about $5.50. That would jump to $7.50, or what officials said would cost an average smoker roughly $750 more a year, if the cigarette makers pass the increase along to consumers.

It would be nice to see everyone stop smoking because of the increase. However, what will happen to the many bureaucracies created from tobacco taxes if that money dries up. Will they just simply go away with the smoke, or will taxpayers (non-smokers) then be hit with other new taxes to make up the shortfall? We fear the latter. Sin taxes, as these are often called, are popular with those wanting tax increases because not everybody smokes or drinks and they are relatively easy to pass. They also sound good, but we know much of the money is siphoned off before actually accomplishing what is promised. Today, it’s cigarettes. Tomorrow it will be soda drinks, and alcohol cannot be far behind. Don’t be fooled by these measures. They are what they look — tax hikes.

— California’s Porterville Recorder

More in Opinion

Former Democratic state Rep. Beth Kerttula holds up a sign reading “Vote No Con Con,” during a recent rally at the Dimond Courthouse Plaza in Juneau. Opposition to a constitutional convention, which could alter the Alaska State Constitution to allow for banning abortions was a frequent topic during the protest. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Alaska Voices: A constitutional convention would be doomed to fail

Principled compromise has given way to the unyielding demands of performative politicians

(Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: We’re at risk of losing our well-crafted constitution

Vote no for a constitutional convention in November.

Christina Whiting.
Point of View: Thanks to the Homer community for efforts to find and honor Duffy Murnane

The Duffy Memorial Bench Dedication was moving and healing.

Sticky notes filled out in response to the question “Why does Democracy and voting matter?” are photographed on Saturday, June 25, 2022, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo courtesy Alex Koplin)
6 words to define democracy

What words would you use?

Opinion: The latest gun regulation bill is nothing to cheer about

The legislation resembles the timid movements of a couple of 6-month old children…

The U.S. Capitol is seen in Washington, D.C. in this file photo. (File)
Opinion: The Alaskans with the power to defend America’s democracy

It’s well past time to publicly refute Trump’s lie

Opinion: Here’s what I expect of lawmakers in a post-Roe America

I urge lawmakers to codify abortion rights at the state and federal levels.

Opinion: Confusion over ranked choice voting persists

Voter confusion over ballot procedures will continue

Most Read