Alaska LNG Project Manager Brad Chastain presents information about the project during a luncheon at the Kenai Chamber Commerce and Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)

Alaska LNG Project Manager Brad Chastain presents information about the project during a luncheon at the Kenai Chamber Commerce and Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)

Environmental groups file latest legal challenge to Alaska LNG Project

The groups include the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity

A handful of environmental conservation groups that oppose the proposed Alaska Liquefied Natural Gas Project on Friday announced their latest move in a yearslong legal back-and-forth with the U.S. Department of Energy.

The groups — which include the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity — are appealing a department ruling handed down in June, which upheld the department’s 2020 approval of oil and gas exports from the long-awaited pipeline project.

The Alaska LNG Project would move gas from the North Slope through an 800-mile pipeline to a liquefaction plant in Nikiski for shipment overseas. After Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, project proponents described a unique window of opportunity to get the project done, as countries divesting from Russian oil began looking elsewhere for energy resources.

Alaska’s Congressional delegation, including U.S. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, as well as voting bodies on the Kenai Peninsula were quick to throw their support behind the revived interest. Among the benefits, they say, are new jobs and economic development for the peninsula, a new source of oil and gas for Alaskans and the potential to meet a new global demand.

Murkowski told the Clarion earlier this month that the Alaska LNG Project is in a “good place,” regarding federal permits, but that her office is still working to secure funds. Specifically, Murkowski said she’s working to secure a federal loan guarantee for the project, which is expected to cost between $40 billion and $50 billion.

Opposition has been swift, however, from local and national environmental groups, who have criticized new investment in fossil fuels, expressed skepticism toward new global oil and gas demand and lambasted the potential environmental harms of the project, which they say threaten, among other things, endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales.

At a June meeting held in Kenai by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, however, attendee feedback was mixed. Some who spoke said the pipeline would bring needed economic opportunities to the peninsula and free up more resources, while others shared environmental concerns and questioned the corporation’s enlistment of Goldman Sachs to help secure project funding.

The Sierra Club’s opposition to the project goes back to 2020, the year the Department of Energy first greenlit exports from the project.

The Sierra Club in September 2020 requested a rehearing of the department’s approval of project exports. The organization argued that the Department of Energy Violated the National Environmental Policy Act by relying on an environmental impact statement that didn’t evaluate the impacts of producing the gas that would be exported.

The Department of Energy in April 2021 granted the Sierra Club’s request for a rehearing to allow two Alaska-specific environmental studies to be conducted. The additional studies generated a second project environmental impact survey, called the supplemental environmental impact survey.

The department in April 2023 upheld its approval of Alaska LNG exports, saying that the results of the studies didn’t change its belief that project exports are in the public interest.

“Upon review, DOE finds that the environmental impacts presented in the Final (supplemental environmental impact survey) are not sufficient to alter DOE’s determination under NGA section 3(a) that exports of LNG from the proposed Alaska LNG Project to non-FTA countries are not inconsistent with the public interest, as set forth in the Alaska LNG Order (Order No. 3643-A) issued on August 20, 2020,” the April 13, 2023, order says.

The two studies did prompt the department to newly require that Alaska LNG, as part of a monthly report, certify that natural gas produced by the project for export did not, during the previous month, emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere “unless required for emergency, maintenance, or operational exigencies” and in compliance with the department’s order.

Then in May, the Sierra Club, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and Cook Inletkeeper, requested another rehearing on the April approval. In seeking another rehearing, the groups, among other things, pushed back against the Department of Energy’s claim that Alaska LNG exports are consistent with the public interest, calling that determination “arbitrary and capricious.”

The groups also argued the department’s final supplemental environmental impact survey did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Department of Energy in June denied the request for a rehearing and refuted each of the claims made by the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity.

“DOE’s statement of purpose and need more than meets the standard of reasonableness, and Intervenors mischaracterize this requirement to fit their aims, not that of NEPA,” the June 14 order says regarding the groups’ “arbitrary and capricious” argument.

The three environmental groups on Friday announced that they are appealing that denial, with leaders from each reiterating their collective position in a press release.

“There is no demonstrated global market need for these exports and by 2030, the earliest date this project can expect to begin exporting liquefied methane gas, interest in gas will have waned,” Sierra Club Alaska Chapter Director Andrea Feniger is quoted as saying in the release. “DOE has unlawfully ignored the project’s environmental harms and underestimated its climate impacts. If this project moves forward, Alaska will be left to deal with a stranded asset and the ever worsening impacts from climate change.”

A full docket of legal action taken regarding the Department of Energy’s approval of Alaska LNG exports can be found at

Reach reporter Ashlyn O’Hara at

CORRECTION: A previous verion of the story incorrectly identified Cook Inletkeeper as one of the groups appealing the Department of Energy’s June denial of a rehearing. Cook Inletkeeper participated in the May request for a rehearing, but is not appealing the department’s ruling. The Clarion regrets the error.

More in News

Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion
Brad Snowden and Julie Crites participate in a Seward City Council candidate forum at the Seward Community Library in Seward on Thursday.
Seward council candidates discuss issues at election forum

Participating in Thursday’s forum were Julie Crites and Brad Snowden

Cam Choy, associate professor of art at Kenai Peninsula College, works on a salmon sculpture in collaboration with the Kenai Watershed Forum during the Kenai River Festival at Soldotna Creek Park in Soldotna, Alaska, on June 8, 2019. (Peninsula Clarion file)
Soldotna adopts arts and culture master plan

The plan outlines how the city plans to support arts and culture over the next 10 years

Architect Nancy Casey speaks in front of a small gathering at the Fireside Chat presented by the Kenai Watershed Forum on Nov. 30, 2022, at Kenai River Brewing in Soldotna, Alaska. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Kenai Watershed Forum’s Fireside Chats return Wednesday

The chats will cover a range of interesting topics, centered on knowledge, research and projects

Erosion of the Kenai bluff near the Kenai Senior Center. (Photo by Aidan Curtin courtesy Scott Curtin)
Kenai to sign bluff stabilization agreement Monday

A signing event will be held at 5:30 p.m. at the Kenai Senior Center

Engineer Lake Cabin can be seen in the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge on Nov. 21, 2021. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Public comment accepted for proposed rate increases for overnight fees at refuge

Campsites would increase $5 per night and cabins would increase $10 per night

Abigal Craig, youth winner of the Seventh Annual Kenai Silver Salmon Derby, is presented a novelty check by Kenai River Sportfishing Association Executive Director Shannon Martin, City of Kenai Mayor Brian Gabriel, and Kenai Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Samantha Springer at the Kenai Chamber of Commerce and Visitor Center in Kenai, Alaska, on Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Silver Salmon Derby nets fish, funds for river protection

116 fish were weighed by 79 anglers across the six days of competition

Soldotna Public Works Director Kyle Kornelis talks about the Soldotna field house project during a Soldotna City Council meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 14, 2022, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Soldotna awards field house contract

Anchorage-based Criterion General, Inc. will construct the facility

Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Peter Micciche testifies before the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly during a meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 21, 2023, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Assembly to let borough mayors speak sooner during meetings

The mayor’s report will now be given after the first round of public comments and before public hearings and new assembly business

Assembly members Lane Chesley, left, and Richard Derkevorkian participate in a borough assembly meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Haara/Peninsula Clarion)
Assembly asks state to allow term limits for school board members

Alaska Statute does not allow term limits to be imposed on school board members

Most Read