Alaska LNG Project Manager Brad Chastain presents information about the project during a luncheon at the Kenai Chamber Commerce and Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)

Alaska LNG Project Manager Brad Chastain presents information about the project during a luncheon at the Kenai Chamber Commerce and Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 6, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)

Environmental groups file latest legal challenge to Alaska LNG Project

The groups include the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity

A handful of environmental conservation groups that oppose the proposed Alaska Liquefied Natural Gas Project on Friday announced their latest move in a yearslong legal back-and-forth with the U.S. Department of Energy.

The groups — which include the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity — are appealing a department ruling handed down in June, which upheld the department’s 2020 approval of oil and gas exports from the long-awaited pipeline project.

The Alaska LNG Project would move gas from the North Slope through an 800-mile pipeline to a liquefaction plant in Nikiski for shipment overseas. After Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, project proponents described a unique window of opportunity to get the project done, as countries divesting from Russian oil began looking elsewhere for energy resources.

Alaska’s Congressional delegation, including U.S. Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, as well as voting bodies on the Kenai Peninsula were quick to throw their support behind the revived interest. Among the benefits, they say, are new jobs and economic development for the peninsula, a new source of oil and gas for Alaskans and the potential to meet a new global demand.

Murkowski told the Clarion earlier this month that the Alaska LNG Project is in a “good place,” regarding federal permits, but that her office is still working to secure funds. Specifically, Murkowski said she’s working to secure a federal loan guarantee for the project, which is expected to cost between $40 billion and $50 billion.

Opposition has been swift, however, from local and national environmental groups, who have criticized new investment in fossil fuels, expressed skepticism toward new global oil and gas demand and lambasted the potential environmental harms of the project, which they say threaten, among other things, endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales.

At a June meeting held in Kenai by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, however, attendee feedback was mixed. Some who spoke said the pipeline would bring needed economic opportunities to the peninsula and free up more resources, while others shared environmental concerns and questioned the corporation’s enlistment of Goldman Sachs to help secure project funding.

The Sierra Club’s opposition to the project goes back to 2020, the year the Department of Energy first greenlit exports from the project.

The Sierra Club in September 2020 requested a rehearing of the department’s approval of project exports. The organization argued that the Department of Energy Violated the National Environmental Policy Act by relying on an environmental impact statement that didn’t evaluate the impacts of producing the gas that would be exported.

The Department of Energy in April 2021 granted the Sierra Club’s request for a rehearing to allow two Alaska-specific environmental studies to be conducted. The additional studies generated a second project environmental impact survey, called the supplemental environmental impact survey.

The department in April 2023 upheld its approval of Alaska LNG exports, saying that the results of the studies didn’t change its belief that project exports are in the public interest.

“Upon review, DOE finds that the environmental impacts presented in the Final (supplemental environmental impact survey) are not sufficient to alter DOE’s determination under NGA section 3(a) that exports of LNG from the proposed Alaska LNG Project to non-FTA countries are not inconsistent with the public interest, as set forth in the Alaska LNG Order (Order No. 3643-A) issued on August 20, 2020,” the April 13, 2023, order says.

The two studies did prompt the department to newly require that Alaska LNG, as part of a monthly report, certify that natural gas produced by the project for export did not, during the previous month, emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere “unless required for emergency, maintenance, or operational exigencies” and in compliance with the department’s order.

Then in May, the Sierra Club, along with the Center for Biological Diversity and Cook Inletkeeper, requested another rehearing on the April approval. In seeking another rehearing, the groups, among other things, pushed back against the Department of Energy’s claim that Alaska LNG exports are consistent with the public interest, calling that determination “arbitrary and capricious.”

The groups also argued the department’s final supplemental environmental impact survey did not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Department of Energy in June denied the request for a rehearing and refuted each of the claims made by the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity.

“DOE’s statement of purpose and need more than meets the standard of reasonableness, and Intervenors mischaracterize this requirement to fit their aims, not that of NEPA,” the June 14 order says regarding the groups’ “arbitrary and capricious” argument.

The three environmental groups on Friday announced that they are appealing that denial, with leaders from each reiterating their collective position in a press release.

“There is no demonstrated global market need for these exports and by 2030, the earliest date this project can expect to begin exporting liquefied methane gas, interest in gas will have waned,” Sierra Club Alaska Chapter Director Andrea Feniger is quoted as saying in the release. “DOE has unlawfully ignored the project’s environmental harms and underestimated its climate impacts. If this project moves forward, Alaska will be left to deal with a stranded asset and the ever worsening impacts from climate change.”

A full docket of legal action taken regarding the Department of Energy’s approval of Alaska LNG exports can be found at energy.gov/fecm/articles/alaska-lng-project-llc-fe-dkt-no-14-96-lng.

Reach reporter Ashlyn O’Hara at ashlyn.ohara@peninsulaclarion.com.

CORRECTION: A previous verion of the story incorrectly identified Cook Inletkeeper as one of the groups appealing the Department of Energy’s June denial of a rehearing. Cook Inletkeeper participated in the May request for a rehearing, but is not appealing the department’s ruling. The Clarion regrets the error.

More in News

A woman stands with her sign held up during a rally in support of Medicaid and South Peninsula Hospital on Wednesday, June 18, 2025 in Homer, Alaska. (Chloe Pleznac/Homer News)
Homer residents rally in support of South Peninsula Hospital and Medicaid

The community gathered on Wednesday in opposition to health care cuts that threaten rural hospitals.

Hunter Kirby holds up the hatchery king salmon he bagged during the one-day youth fishery on the Ninilchik River on Wednesday, June 7, 2023 in Ninilchik, Alaska. Photo by Mike Booz
Ninilchik River closed to sport fishing

The closure is in effect from June 23 through July 15.

Señor Panchos in Soldotna, Alaska, is closed on Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Soldotna restaurant owner remains in ICE custody; federal charges dropped

Francisco Rodriguez-Rincon was accused of being in the country illegally and falsely claiming citizenship on a driver’s license application.

Brent Johnson speaks during a meeting of the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly in Soldotna, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Borough to provide maximum funding for school district

The Kenai Peninsula Borough School District will receive less money from the state this year than it did last year.

Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion
Pool manager and swim coach Will Hubler leads a treading water exercise at Kenai Central High School on Tuesday.
Pools, theaters, libraries in jeopardy as cuts loom

The district issued “notices of non-retention” to all its pool managers, library aides and theater technicians.

A sockeye salmon is pictured in Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 25, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Fishing slow on Russian River, improving on Kenai

Northern Kenai fishing report for Tuesday, June 17.

Josiah Kelly, right, appears for a superior court arraignment at the Kenai Courthouse in Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, Nov. 26, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Anchor Point man accepts plea deal for November shootings

Buildings operated by a local health clinic and an addiction recovery nonprofit were targeted.

A demonstrator holds up a sign during the “No Kings” protest on Saturday, June 14, 2025, at WKFL Park in Homer, Alaska. (Chloe Pleznac/Homer News)
Homer hits the streets to say ‘No Kings’

Around 700 gathered locally as part of a nationwide protest.

Brooklyn Coleman, right, staffs The Squeeze Squad lemonade stand during Lemonade Day in Soldotna, Alaska, on Saturday, June 14, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Kids learn business skills at annual Lemonade Day

Around 40 stands were strewn around Soldotna, Kenai, Nikiski and Sterling for the event.

Most Read