Time to consider a time change

  • Friday, March 13, 2015 9:27am
  • Opinion

Keep military intact in Alaska

It’s no time to reduce the military.

And given the current global volatility and Alaska’s geographic location, neither should this state be targeted for military base reductions.

Alaska has its eye on Arctic development, some of which would be beneficial to Ketchikan’s economy, but it isn’t alone. Russia, too, is eyeing the Arctic, and with the intent of militarizing its presence there.

Alaska and the nation need to be prepared in the Arctic to protect Alaskan interests and that of all Americans.

ADVERTISEMENT
0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 0%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
00:00
00:00
00:00
 

Fort Richardson and Fort Wainwright, two of about 30 bases being considered for troop reductions, should experience anything but. Instead, the troops should be increased at those two bases.

If the federal government insists on troop reductions, it should proceed strategically. Reducing shouldn’t be based on the popularity of the Army presence in a particular community or the number of Alaskans and Americans who make a case for reductions at one base or another, according to Alaska’s congressional delegation.

Military strategy should be the key determinant of where the Army should base.

Alaska’s proximity — over the North Pole from most of the world’s conflict zones — is the principal reason military folks have long regarded Alaska as a highly desirable and necessary base for the nation. Watching events in Asia, the Pacific and Russia only reinforces that reasoning.

This is the time to build up the military, particularly in Alaska.

— Ketchikan Daily News

March 10

Time to consider a time change

Southeast came out in force against eliminating daylight saving time statewide this week.

A bill to eliminate daylight saving time in Alaska is moving through the state Legislature. While many Alaskans outside of Southeast support the bill, this region does not. Testimony before legislators reinforced that point of view.

If Alaskans wish to stop the back and forth of switching clocks in the spring and fall to theoretically save daylight, then Alaska should adopt Pacific Standard time — or at least let Southeast be in the Pacific zone while other parts of the state stay on Alaska time and eliminate daylight saving.

For the past at least 25 years, Ketchikan businesses, in particular, favored the region being on Pacific time.

The argument boiled down to the intricate ties Ketchikan and Southeast have with Seattle and the Pacific Northwest.

The region conducts much business in the Pacific; likely much more than it does with points in the northern regions.

It’s already an hour behind the Pacific, which means ordering goods and taking advantage of services in the Seattle area already cease an hour before businesses close here. If Alaska only ended daylight saving time without making another adjustment, Ketchikan and Southeast would lag two hours behind the Pacific Northwest time, costing local business two hours in valuable commerce in the spring and summer.

This commerce includes the transport of goods and providers of services into the region, as well as giving Southeast Alaskans the means to quickly and efficiently travel and send products to Seattle and the Pacific.

But all of the commerce isn’t strictly business. Seattle is the travel hub for Ketchikan and Southeast to most places. Southeast Alaskans often don’t go visit relatives or vacation without traveling on flights through Seattle. Flight connections with a two-hour time difference could become problematic.

Given that argument, it’s also important for Alaskans to the north of Southeast to be time-coordinated with the state capital. To accomplish this and eliminate all of the clock switching, most of the state — particularly the population centers of Anchorage and Fairbanks — also could come along on the switch to Pacific time.

Points north also conduct considerable business in the Pacific Northwest.

And, for the federal offices and others who interact with other places in the Lower 48, adoption of Pacific time would increase the ease of doing both professional and personal business.

This isn’t a new idea. Local businesses pursued it with Gov. Walter J. Hickel and the state Department of Transportation in the early 1990s. Time has been an Alaska topic other times, too. But, now, it perhaps is an idea whose time has come: Place Southeast on Pacific time.

But, in the meantime, be sure to switch clocks forward Sunday morning. This is the weekend when Alaska moves to daylight saving time.

— Ketchikan Daily News

March 7

More in Opinion

Dick Maitland, a foley artist, works on the 46th season of “Sesame Street” at Kaufman Astoria Studios in New York, Dec. 15, 2025. (Ariana McLaughlin/The New York Times)
Opinion: Trump’s embarrassing immaturity Republicans won’t acknowledge

Sullivan should be embarrassed by the ignorance and immaturity the president is putting on display for the world to see.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024 in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Choosing our priorities wisely

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in support overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 69 at the Alaska Capitol in Juneau, Alaska, on Tuesday, April 22, 2025. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: As session nears end, pace picks up in Juneau

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Alaska Department of Education and Early Development Commissioner Deena Bishop and Gov. Mike Dunleavy discuss his veto of an education bill during a press conference March 15, 2024, at the Alaska State Capitol. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Strong policy, proven results

Why policy and funding go hand in hand.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The Jones Act — crass protectionism, but for whom?

Alaska is dependent on the few U.S.-built ships carrying supplies from Washington state to Alaska.

Cook Inlet can be seen at low tide from North Kenai Beach on June 15, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Solving the Cook Inlet gas crisis

While importing LNG is necessary in the short term, the Kenai Peninsula is in dire need of a stable long-term solution.

Sockeye salmon caught in a set gillnet are dragged up onto the beach at a test site for selective harvest setnet gear in Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 25, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Creating opportunities with better fishery management

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

The ranked choice outcome for Alaska’s U.S. Senate race is shown during an Alaska Public Media broadcast on Nov. 24, 2022. (Alaska Division of Elections)
Opinion: Alaska should keep ranked choice voting, but let’s make it easier

RCV has given Alaskans a better way to express their preferences.

The Alaska State Capitol on March 1. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Keep Alaska open for business

Our job as lawmakers is to ensure that laws passed at the ballot box work effectively on the ground.

Most Read