Voices of Alaska: Tax loopholes for oil companies need to be closed

  • By Reps. Les Gara and David Guttenberg
  • Saturday, April 2, 2016 5:57pm
  • Opinion

This coming year Alaska will pay more to oil companies in “tax credits” than we receive in Oil Production Taxes — for the third year in a row. It gets worse. The Department of Revenue forecasts that tax loopholes will provide Alaskans with NO Oil Production Tax revenue for the next decade — from any future oil fields, and from any fields that started after 2002. That’s a great deal if you can get it.

A recent opinion piece echoed what many corporate representatives and lobbyists have come to Juneau to pitch. Much of corporate Alaska has lined up to say the burden of Alaska’s $4.4 billion deficit to be placed on someone else. The recent op-ed argues oil companies should keep all lucrative tax exemptions, and not chip in to help with our record deficit even when oil prices rise and oil companies earn healthy profits on our oil.

Get in line gentlemen, as you join those who’d drive Alaska towards a recession, and turn a blind eye towards proposed harmful budget cuts to people with disabilities, seniors, and to those who deserve quality public schools and a strong University.

We’re in this together. We should work together for a fair, balanced, and smart approach to put this state on a path to a bright future, not a dim one. We want an Alaska where people want to raise their children, not an Alaska where parents and students start thinking about taking their talents elsewhere.

Cuts to wasteful spending should certainly be part of a fair plan, and we voted to cut $700 million from the budget last year. But we’re not OK with continuing cuts that go far beyond waste, that now include proposed budget cuts to Alaskans living with disabilities, seniors who helped build this state, and children. There’s a difference between spending on multi-billion dollar megaprojects, and an overpriced Legislative Office Building, which we’ve voted against, and cuts to opportunity and dignity.

That’s why we can’t agree to join the gentlemen who wrote the op-ed. Protecting expensive oil tax exemptions leads to a future where the budget will be cut with a chainsaw, and not a scalpel.

Here are a few things you should know.

According to the Department of Revenue the oil tax law adopted in 2013 is predicted to bring Alaskans exactly zero dollars in Oil Production Taxes from every field that’s gone into production after 2002, and any future fields until 2026.

Why? Current law has a bargain basement tax rate on all post-2002 oil fields. It is zero at current $35-$40 oil prices, and still zero all the way up prices of $73 per barrel when companies generate good profits.

What about our older oil fields? The 2013 law has a small four percent emergency “oil tax floor” for fields started in 2002 and before. That minimum tax makes some sense at current low prices. But it remains in place all the way up to oil prices of $76 a barrel — prices where companies make healthy profits. In fairness, that tax floor should modestly rise as prices and company profits rise. And rules allowing companies to get around that “tax floor” should be fixed.

The op-ed also says Alaska reaps “big dividends” because of these loopholes. They claim the 2013 law is responsible for a great turnaround in oil production. Here’s the truth.

Every new oil field since the 2013 oil law passed, and every field that companies have announced will go into production in coming years, was already being invested in before 2013. Investment in these fields was already moving forward. The biggest, “CD-5” in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, was announced before 2013, but was slowed by a wrongly delayed federal bridge permit. Exxon’s Pt. Thomson will soon move forward because the state sued, nearly a decade ago, to force that field from idleness into production. That case was settled in 2012.

Most Alaskans are willing to support a fair, balanced budget plan. That plan will lose public support if it carves out special interest exemptions for our partners in the oil industry.

Reps. Les Gara (Anchorage) and David Guttenberg (Fairbanks) are Democratic members of the House Finance Committee. They can be reached at rep.les.gara@akleg.gov and rep.david.guttenberg@akleg.gov.

More in Opinion

The Safeway supermarket in Juneau, seen here Oct. 4, 2023, is among those in Alaska scheduled to be sold if its parent company, Albertsons Companies Inc., merges with Kroger Co., the parent company of Fred Meyer. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Alaska’s attorney general flunks math test

One supermarket owner is less competitive than two, and more competition is good for shoppers

AKPIRG logo. Photo courtesy of AKPIRG
Opinion: With the right regulations, the SAVE Act can unlock energy prosperity in Alaska

Since 2010, only homeowners have been able to invest in and earn monthly bill savings from rooftop solar

Jenny Carroll (Courtesy)
Opinion: Homer Harbor plays critical role in community, economy

This gateway to Cook Inlet fuels everything from recreation and food security to commercial enterprises

Voters fill out their ballots at the Challenger Learning Center in Kenai, Alaska on Election Day, Nov. 8, 2022. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Voter tidbit: Get prepared for the Oct. 1 municipal election

Check your voting status or register to vote online

Library of Congress image
A painting of George Washington at Valley Forge, circa 1911 by Edward Percy Moran.
Opinion: Washington’s selfless example is lost on too many public servants

Biden isn’t the only national politician who struggled emotionally against the currents of aging.

Cindy Harris. (Courtesy)
Support funding for Adult Day services

These services offer a safe place for Alaskans to bring their loved ones

Voters fill out their ballots at the Challenger Learning Center in Kenai, Alaska on Election Day, Nov. 8, 2022. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Voter tidbit: 2 election stories highlight voting challenges in rural Alaska

The state needs to make voting in rural areas more accommodating

(Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Permanent Fund troubles make for sad music

Alaskans are fiddling while the Permanent Fund burns

Signage marks the entrance to Nikiski Middle/High School on Monday, May 16, 2022, in Nikiski, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: How our schools have lost touch with Alaskans

Off-road vehicles are a way of life for Nikiski residents

tease
Point of View: There is nothing to like about Project 2025

Project 2025 - Presidential Transition Project’s intent is radical

A voting booth for the Kenai Peninsula Borough and City of Homer elections is placed at the Cowles Council Chambers on Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2022 in Homer, Alaska. (Photo by Charlie Menke/Homer News)
Opinion: Safeguarding our children’s future

Alaska stands at a pivotal moment ahead of the 2024 election

Voters fill out their ballots at the Challenger Learning Center in Kenai, Alaska on Election Day, Nov. 8, 2022. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Voter tidbit: What is your voting story?

Voting is crucial for democracy to work