Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)

Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)

Opinion: U.S. should treat tariffs with a cold shoulder

The problem is that the U.S. imposes tariffs on what we buy.

The country is looking at tariffs the wrong way. This isn’t a new problem — we’ve been making the same mistake since the first U.S. tariffs on imported goods in 1790. But the self-inflicted case of mistaken identity has gone on far too long and it’s time to fix it.

The problem is that the U.S. imposes tariffs on what we buy, which is why the added cost often ends up hurting no one but ourselves. And now the country is talking about even more and larger tariffs on what we buy for our homes, business and factories — the very items that many consider essential to their daily living.

Though a lot of people see tariffs as a way to punish foreign countries, we’re the ones who want cheap clothes, cheap electronics, cheap furniture and cheap shoes. We’ve been poking ourselves in the eye and wondering why it hurts.

The biggest argument from tariff supporters is that financial penalties on imported goods can boost U.S. manufacturers by handicapping their competition. Make it more expensive to buy a bicycle made in China and maybe millions of Americans will be willing to pay more for one made in America to preserve jobs in the U.S.

Regardless of whether higher tariffs will help or hurt the U.S. economy and jobs, it leads to nasty political debates, uncertain economic predictions and more shouting across social media, which is the last thing this country needs.

I have a better idea: Don’t put a tariff on what we want in America, slap a financial penalty on what we don’t want. Like the Arctic Blast, also known as the Polar Vortex or the Damn-It’s-Cold-In-Dallas weather front that is swooping into the U.S. in increasing frequency from Russia and Canada.

Americans enjoy their maple syrup from Canada, Tim Horton’s donuts (the maple leaf version of Dunkin), the plentiful crude piped from Alberta oil sands that is the perfect grade for Midwest refineries. Certainly, some Americans prefer Canadian beer, Canada Goose outerwear, Northwest Territories diamonds with a lovable polar bear laser-etched into the edge, canola oil from Saskatchewan and $2 billion a year of chocolates (who knew).

So why punish ourselves by making all those products more expensive. Turn around the tariff argument and punish the countries that send us all those polar cold spells that snap equipment, sap our energy and tap out our savings to pay the heating bill.

Looking at the map for the most recent deep freeze, the jet stream picked up frigid temps in Russia’s Siberia, then dipped, curved and crossed north of Alaska before running through Canada, supercharging its cold before invading the U.S. — no border checks required.

And just an FYI: The air flow never crossed Greenland as it swirled around high above. So we can’t use it as an excuse to attack our Arctic brethren.

Change the tariff law so that every time Americans from the Mountain States to as far south as Texas get frozen out of their cars or their water pipes freeze or their Canada Goose down jacket isn’t enough to keep them warm at 20 below, send a tariff invoice to our next-door northern neighbors.

But I wouldn’t bother putting a tariff on Russia for its part in the cold weather. They’d probably try to pay the bill with more of the farmed salmon they dump on the market.

Larry Persily is the publisher of the Wrangell Sentinel.

More in Opinion

The Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. building is photographed in Juneau. (Clarise Larson/Juneau Empire file)
Opinion: State cannot afford better schools and also big PFDs

Most legislators believe more state money for local school districts should be on the list of essential services.

A sign welcomes employees and visitors at the Kenai Peninsula Borough administration building on Tuesday, March 17, 2020, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo by Victoria Petersen/Peninsula Clarion file)
Opinion: Fair property taxes, oh my

Our local tax system is not perfect, but it does represent an attempt to fairly balance community interests.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Education looms large in fast-paced start to session

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Meg Zaletel (Courtesy)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Policies and budget decisions that impact housing impact people’s well-being.

Therese Lewandowski. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Let’s raise equal rights for women

There is much more to our gender inequality story.

The Alaska State Capitol is seen in this undated file photo. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire)
Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: U.S. should treat tariffs with a cold shoulder

The problem is that the U.S. imposes tariffs on what we buy.