While it may not be required, public disclosure is the best practice

  • By Peninsula Clarion Editorial
  • Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:16pm
  • Opinion

This past week, the Alaska Public Offices Commission held a hearing to address, among other things, an appeal of a decision involving an Alaska Department of Fish and Game official.

The initial complaint claimed that Kelly Hepler should have filed a public disclosure for gifts he received from the Kenai River Sportfishing Association for his participation in the Kenai River Classic.

APOC had dismissed the complaint based on Hepler’s assertion that in his position with Fish and Game, he is not required to file disclosures.

While that argument is straightforward, here’s where things get a little fishy. The state maintains a list of positions for which public disclosures are required, and what Hepler says is his official title — Special Projects Coordinator — is not on that list.

But the appeal is based on the fact that in various Fish and Game documents, including press releases and biographical information on the department’s website, Hepler is listed as a former Special Assistant to the Commissioner, a position which would have required public disclosure.

In 2010 he was appointed as an “Assistant Commissioner,” a position that is not listed as requiring public disclosure. Helper argues that his “Assistant Commissioner” title is a “working title” and not his official title.

From a legal perspective, the argument that Hepler was not required to file public disclosures appears correct.

But that conclusion can only be read as a loss for the public’s right to know. Regardless of official title — or working title, for that matter — an official in a position of authority and influence in a government agency has an ethical obligation to disclose to the public anything of value received from organizations or individuals seeking to influence that agency.

The Kenai River Sportfishing Association more than meets that definition. In fact, Fish and Game Commissioner Cora Campbell and Department of Natural Resources Deputy Commissioner Ed Fogels already amended their financial disclosures to APOC, in response to complaints filed at the same time as those against Hepler, that they failed to disclose gifts they received from the Kenai River Sportfishing Association.

And according to Fish and Game’s heirarchy, Hepler’s “working title” as “assistant commissioner” is one that reports directly to the commissioner. It is clear that his position with the department is one that carries enough weight to merit a higher level of public scrutiny.

Fish and Game’s decision-making processes has become increasingly opaque. Too often, documentation of how decisions have been reached is withheld from public view. In fact, a public records request made by the Clarion ahead of the Upper Cook Inlet Board of Fisheries meeting looking for details to explain how the department arrived at its position on certain proposals, was denied with the claim that the requested emails were “draft” material, and as such did not have to be released to the public.

In other words, the process by which Fish and Game is making important policy decisions — and just who within the department making those decisions — is, in the department’s opinion, none of the public’s business.

And if you have a title that’s not on the list of positions required to file public disclosures, we have to ask, just who are you accountable to?

A change in culture with regard to public disclosure is long past due. Agency officials need to remember they are accountable to the public for the decisions they make. The public has a right to know how those decisions are being made — and who is influencing them. Quite frankly, if there’s something a public official is reluctant to disclose to the public, especially when it involves gifts from prominent lobbying and advocacy organizations, they probably shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.

More in Opinion

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Snow blows off Mt. Roberts high above the Thane avalanche chute, where an avalanche blew across the road during a major snowstorm. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
An Alaska winter of discontent

It’s been a hard winter throughout the state.

A Uncruise Adventures cruise ship, with a fleet of kayaks in the water behind it, in the Tongass National Forest. Uncruise, a boutique local cruise ship operator, has been vocal about the importance of the intact Tongass National Forest, or SeaBank, to its business. (Photo by Ben Hamilton/courtesy Salmon State)
Alaska Voices: The dividends paid by Southeast Alaska’s ‘Seabank’ are the state’s untold secrets

Southeast Alaska’s natural capital produces economic outputs from the seafood and visitor products industries worth several billion dollars a year

Opinion: The pulse of fealty

Let’s be honest. Trump’s demands go beyond his one stated condition.

Former Gov. Frank Murkowski speaks on a range of subjects during an interview with the Juneau Empire in May 2019. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Alaska Voices: Permanent fund integrity in peril?

Alaskans need to be kept informed of what the trustees are doing with their money.

A cast member holds up a cue card in Soldotna High School’s production of "Annie" on Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2021. (Camille Botello/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Is theater dead?

“It will not be an easy task, performing CPR on this theater, but imagine the joy that you could bring to the students.”

Bjørn Olson (Photo provided)
Point of View: Homer Drawdown moves forward with climate-change solutions

Two years ago, a small group of concerned citizens decided to use this book as a guiding document

A “Vote Here” sign is seen at the City of Kenai building on Monday, Sept. 21 in Kenai, Alaska.
Voices of the Peninsula: Fight for democracy

When the Insurrection occurred on Jan. 6, 2021, it was a direct attack on our democratic rule of law.

Most Read