What others say: Alaskans’ passion for the PFD is a hug of death

  • Sunday, June 19, 2016 4:12pm
  • Opinion

You can hug something to death, you know.

Alaskans are about to learn that lesson.

On Friday, the House Finance Committee voted 5-6 against moving Senate Bill 128 out of committee and on to the floor for a vote of the full House.

SB 128 is the cornerstone of any fix to Alaska’s multibillion-dollar deficit. It takes an annual 5.25 percent draw from the Permanent Fund to pay for state services and the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend.

It won’t solve the whole deficit, but it’ll fix between half and two-thirds of the problem.

It’s a sane, sensible approach, and it failed.

The problem wasn’t the lawmakers casting the vote, which failed in a bipartisan way. The problem was with we, the people.

You see, SB 128 will cut the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend as a side effect of its budget-cutting goal. This year, the dividend is expected to be $2,000. The version of SB 128 being considered by the finance committee would have lowered that to $1,500.

The PFD has long been considered the third rail of Alaska politics. Touch it and die.

In the weeks before Friday’s vote, lawmakers have received a tsunami of emails and phone calls from Alaskans urging them to vote no. On Tuesday night, when the committee heard public testimony, three-fifths of the callers asked lawmakers to vote no.

Alaskans love the dividend, and that love has been on display this session. On Friday, that love for the PFD led six lawmakers to vote “no.”

That love may now mean the PFD’s death.

You see, the state’s savings are running out rapidly. The “no” vote on SB 128 means the state will spend nearly $4 billion from its Constitutional Budget Reserve, which serves as Alaska’s savings account.

By this time next year, there will be barely more than $3 billion in that reserve. We will not have enough money to pay for things like schools, troopers or health care.

Fortunately, there’s another savings account. That’s the earnings reserve of the Alaska Permanent Fund. The only catch? It’s the same savings account that pays the dividend.

If our spending continues at present rates, the dividend will collapse by 2020. By voting “no” on SB 128, lawmakers are encouraging an end to the Permanent Fund Dividend. By refusing to cut the dividend and insure its long-term health, we are encouraging its short-term death.

Worse yet, the failure to act this year means Alaskans will suffer. Next year, we can expect further budget cuts. On Friday, Rep. Tammie Wilson, R-North Pole, promised that next year the Legislature will look at formula-funded programs for budget cuts.

That means cuts to schools, to health care, to state employee pay — all of which are funded under various formulae.

Without a long-term fix for the deficit, we will lose services that all of us rely upon. Barring a rise in oil prices, we are doing nothing but delaying judgment day.

The fiscal cliff still awaits us, and we are still running headlong toward the edge.

We love the PFD, but our refusal to accept a small cut in our annual gift will cost us dearly.

We aren’t just hugging the PFD, we’re hugging a knife. And it’s gutting us.

— Juneau Empire,

June 19

More in Opinion

Alan Parks is a Homer resident and commercial fisher. (Courtesy photo)
Voices of the Peninsula: HB 52 would hurt commercial fishing and community

Upper Cook Inlet fishing families have been hit hard by ongoing politics

Opinion: The buck stops at the top

Shared mistakes of Dunleavy and Biden.

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

Most Read