Y’all come back now

  • Saturday, October 22, 2016 2:25pm
  • Opinion

The Alaska Board of Fisheries met in Soldotna, and nothing happened.

Actually, that’s not quite true. During its three-day work session in Soldotna, the board took public testimony and considered a stack of agenda change requests and non-regulatory proposals.

What didn’t happen were all those things cited as reasons for the board not to meet on the peninsula in the past. Comment and debate were civil. People from other parts of the state, including the Mat-Su, were able to testify. The meeting space at the Soldotna Regional Sports Complex met the needs of the board and could accommodate the large number of people who came out to observe and participate. We trust that fish board members and staff were able to find comfortable lodging and good meals during their stay.

In other words, it was a productive meeting, and it’s high time the fish board has more of those on the central Kenai Peninsula, particularly when it comes to decisions on Upper Cook Inlet.

While the fish board has conducted work sessions and task force meetings in the Kenai-Soldotna area, it has not held its Upper Cook Inlet meeting — the one where the decisions are actually made — on the central Kenai Peninsula since 1999. The 2017 meeting will take place in Anchorage from Feb. 23-March 8, and the next Upper Cook Inlet meeting isn’t until 2020.

That means that despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of Upper Cook Inlet proposals deal with Kenai River fisheries, an Upper Cook Inlet meeting held here in 2020 would be the first in more than two decades. Simply stated, that has been unfair to the Kenai Peninsula residents most directly impacted by the board’s decisions.

When it’s working, the fish board process is touted as one of the best public processes anywhere. Proposals are put forward by individuals, user groups, and government agencies for review by local advisory committees. The fish board takes public testimony at its area meeting, and proposals are vetted in a process that includes participation from those in attendance.

However, attending a two-week meeting in Anchorage presents a hardship for would-be participants from the peninsula as those staying for the duration will need to spend thousands on food and lodging. Many peninsula residents are able to take a long weekend to provide public testimony at the start of the meeting, but only those who are being paid to be there, or those who can’t afford not to be there, are in attendance when the board starts making decisions.

What’s more, in previous cycles, the board has made significant regulatory changes via board-generated proposals introduced long after most peninsula residents have had to head back home, leaving little opportunity for public comment and undermining the process.

The current fish board has three new members, including Soldotna resident Robert Ruffner. We’re glad to have been able to host the work session this past week, and we hope that moving forward, the board gives greater consideration to Kenai Peninsula residents as it decides where it will conduct the business that has a dramatic impact on our community.

More in Opinion

The logo for the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District is displayed inside the George A. Navarre Borough Admin Building on Thursday, July 22, 2021 in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Hard to fill positions?

Paying poverty wages to support staff, secretaries and custodians is unacceptable yet routine behavior by our district

A copy of the State of Alaska Official Ballot for the June 11, 2022, Special Primary Election is photographed on May 2, 2022. (Peninsula Clarion staff)
Choosing a candidate – Who will best represent us in D.C.?

Voters are encouraged to do homework before casting a vote

Tourists watch as one of two cubs belonging to an 18-year-old sow black bear crosses the path between groups of tourists visiting the Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 18, 2018. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Tourists have pushed us to critical mass in parts of Juneau

I don’t go to the glacier in the summer now to hike or watch bears.

Sens. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer, left, and Robert Myers, R-North Pole, read through one of 41 amendments submitted to the state’s omnibus budget bill being debate on the floor of the Alaska State Senate on Monday, May 9, 2022. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: The Alaska Senate’s foolish gamble

“All these conservative people just spent all our money”

Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships. (logo provided)
Point of View: A few ideas for Mental Health Awareness Month

What are some things you can practice this month and subsequently apply to your life?

Alex Koplin is a founding member of Kenai Peninsula Votes. (courtesy photo)
Voices of the Peninsula: 1 candidate dined, 47 to go

By Alex Koplin Last month, I wrote a satirical piece for the… Continue reading

Smoke from the Swan Lake Fire impairs visibility on the Sterling Highway on Aug. 20, 2019. (Photo by Victoria Petersen/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Alaskans should prepare for wildfire season

Several past large fire seasons followed snowy winters or unusually rainy springs

Most Read