What others say: Will Alaska’s Democratic Party sell out?

  • Sunday, January 31, 2016 10:08pm
  • Opinion

The Alaska Democratic Party might be a little less democratic if party delegates decide to adopt a rule change at their May meeting.

A spokesman told The Associated Press this week that the party will ask the state’s Division of Elections to implement a change that would allow independent candidates to run in the Democratic primary. The change would be in place for the 2016-17 election cycle, at which time party delegates would have to then renew it in 2018.

It’s too early to say if such a bold change is a stroke a genius or self-destructive; only time will say for sure.

Democratic Party leaders are no doubt hoping to capitalize on the fact that 54 percent of Alaska’s registered voters are not affiliated with any party. They also know how difficult it is for Democrats to win statewide races, and how it’s nearly impossible to win legislative races in some districts. (Only 15 of 40 House members are Democrats, as are five of the 20 Senate members. Rep. Dan Ortiz of Ketchikan is the only independent in the Legislature.)

Allowing independent candidates to run on the party ticket could give Democrats an advantage by becoming more appealing to Alaska’s 276,000 independent voters. Just 14 percent of the state’s 500,000 voters are registered as Democrats, while Republicans claim 26 percent of voters.

But what will the party’s 14 percent think of such a change, and how much is the party willing to compromise when candidates views aren’t completely aligned with that of the national party?

The Alaska Democratic Party is about to tread on new ground if delegates ratify the rule change during its May 2016 convention. While hoping for the best, party members should be prepared for the worst.

In a statement, Alaska Democratic Party chair Casey Steinau said the party wants to be more inclusive, and the change would give its members more choices of who to vote for. But what could happen is voters get fewer choices.

Democratic Party leaders are no doubt eyeing the 2018 gubernatorial race and hoping to land Gov. Bill Walker on their party’s ticket. Otherwise, a rule change of this scope would make far less sense. The change would give the party its best chance at claiming the governor’s office in years. But if Walker were to run in the Democratic primary and win, the regular election could look much like the Republican primary when Walker faced then-Gov. Sean Parnell. Yes, Walker is an independent, but he’s still more aligned with traditional Republican values than Democratic ones.

The Democratic Party’s branding in Alaska ultimately is at stake, and if the party were to choose a pro-life, anti-same-sex marriage candidate who wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act (or any combination thereof), the result could lead to voter apathy among current members at the risk of trying to attract new ones.

Regardless, the change is sure to create division among current members, some of which will feel their party is willing to sell out in order to gain seats that may align more with Republican principles than Democratic ones.

— Juneau Empire, Jan. 29

More in Opinion

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Snow blows off Mt. Roberts high above the Thane avalanche chute, where an avalanche blew across the road during a major snowstorm. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
An Alaska winter of discontent

It’s been a hard winter throughout the state.

A Uncruise Adventures cruise ship, with a fleet of kayaks in the water behind it, in the Tongass National Forest. Uncruise, a boutique local cruise ship operator, has been vocal about the importance of the intact Tongass National Forest, or SeaBank, to its business. (Photo by Ben Hamilton/courtesy Salmon State)
Alaska Voices: The dividends paid by Southeast Alaska’s ‘Seabank’ are the state’s untold secrets

Southeast Alaska’s natural capital produces economic outputs from the seafood and visitor products industries worth several billion dollars a year

Most Read