What others say: An unDemocratic caucus

  • Sunday, April 3, 2016 6:22pm
  • Opinion

Last week’s Alaska Democratic Party caucuses revealed two things: The state’s appreciation for Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vermont, runs deep. Alaska’s Democratic primary is just as deeply broken.

The Alaska Democratic Party praised the fact that more than 10,600 registered Democrats participated in events Saturday. That was a record — more Alaskans participated in the Democratic Party caucuses than ever before. More than 1,000 of them were in Juneau, where the Sheffield Ballroom was filled with standing participants.

That record shows the flaccidity of the caucus system. Statewide, according to the Alaska Division of Elections, there are 70,187 registered voters. That’s a turnout of 15.1 percent.

The Republican presidential primary, held March 1, had a turnout of 17 percent. Two percent might not sound like a lot, but when it comes to picking a president, turnout matters.

Participating in a caucus, while it might be fun for the motivated and involved, disenfranchises those who don’t have three free hours on a particular Saturday morning.

If you don’t have the time, you’re out of luck. If you’re not in town on a particular day, you’re out of luck. If you have to work, you’re out of luck.

If you’re an independent or nonpartisan voter, you’re out of luck.

Caucuses attract a wealthier, less diverse crowd than a simple poll, according to repeated studies and analyses by political scientists. Their turnout is not representative of Alaska — or any other state.

The state’s presidential primaries are run by party officials, not the state of Alaska, and one can see the qualitative difference between a state-run election and one put on by a party. The state is required by law to ensure access to as many Alaskans as possible. The state’s political parties, and particularly the Democratic Party, could learn something.

Furthermore, at the national level the Democratic Party nationally uses an undemocratic “superdelegate” system that ordains individuals with the voting power typically reserved for delegates bound by the results of state primaries.

This system was implemented after the disastrous 1968 Democratic National Convention to stabilize the convention proceedings and make them less populist. It was designed specifically to be undemocratic.

We have heard of superdelegates who say that the results of a state’s election don’t have a bearing on how superdelegates cast their votes. That’s unfortunately true.

At the national level and at the state level, the Democratic Party should switch to a more representative, more inclusive system for picking its presidential candidate.

If a president represents the people, the people should have an unambiguous voice in picking him or her.

— Juneau Empire,

April 1

More in Opinion

Nick Begich III campaign materials sit on tables ahead of a May 16, 2022, GOP debate held in Juneau. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: North to a Brighter Future

The policies championed by the Biden/Harris Administration and their allies in Congress have made it harder for us to live the Alaskan way of life

Soldotna City Council member Linda Farnsworth-Hutchings participates in the Peninsula Clarion and KDLL candidate forum series, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, at the Soldotna Public Library in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: I’m a Soldotna Republican and will vote No on 2

Open primaries and ranked choice voting offer a way to put power back into the hands of voters, where it belongs

Shrubs grow outside of the Kenai Courthouse on Monday, July 3, 2023, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Vote yes to retain Judge Zeman and all judges on your ballot

Alaska’s state judges should never be chosen or rejected based on partisan political agendas

A vintage Underwood typewriter sits on a table on Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2022, at the Homer News in Homer, Alaska. (Photo by Michael Armstrong/Homer News)
Point of View: District 6 needs to return to representation before Vance

Since Vance’s election she has closely aligned herself with the far-right representatives from Mat-Su and Gov. Mike Dunleavy

The Anchor River flows in the Anchor Point State Recreation Area on Saturday, Aug. 5, 2023, in Anchor Point, Alaska. (Delcenia Cosman/Homer News)
Opinion: Help ensure Alaskans have rights to use, enjoy and care for rivers

It is discouraging to see the Department of Natural Resources seemingly on track to erode the public’s ability to protect vital water interests.

A sign directing voters to the Alaska Division of Elections polling place is seen in Kenai, Alaska, Monday, Oct. 21, 2024. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Vote no on Ballot Measure 2

A yes vote would return Alaska to party controlled closed primaries and general elections in which the candidate need not win an outright majority to be elected.

Derrick Green (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 will help businesses and communities thrive

It would not be good for the health and safety of my staff, my customers, or my family if workers are too worried about missing pay to stay home when they are sick.

A sign warns of the presence of endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales at the Kenai Beach in Kenai, Alaska, on Monday, July 10, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Could an unnecessary gold mine drive Cook Inlet belugas extinct?

An industrial port for the proposed Johnson Tract gold mine could decimate the bay

Cassie Lawver. Photo provided by Cassie Lawver
Point of View: A clear choice

Sarah Vance has consistently stood up for policies that reflect the needs of our district

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Point of View: Ranked choice gives voters more voice

The major political parties are not in touch with all Alaskans