Voices of the Peninsula: Medicaid expansion makes sense for Alaska

  • By Mike Navarre
  • Saturday, April 11, 2015 1:25pm
  • Opinion

Why does it make sense to take on Medicaid expansion in these times of fiscal challenges and diminished budgets? Aren’t we supposed to be tightening our belts right about now, boring new holes for the buckle so we can draw them even tighter in years to come? Why would we take money from the Feds, with all those strings attached?

It may seem counter-intuitive to commit to expansion in a time of contracting state budgets. Nonetheless, when you dig deeper into the facts, figures and underlying rationale, it makes good sense to move forward with Medicaid expansion.

Many come to the discussion with the core belief that all Alaskan citizens deserve access to medical care, as a basic human need. I agree. I also believe Alaska should participate in Medicaid expansion because it makes good economic sense for our state.

Medicaid expansion is estimated to create as many as 4,000 new jobs in Alaska by 2021, with potential wages to working Alaskans of $1.2 billion over that time period. The potential for new jobs is increasingly important as Alaska deals with job losses as a result of the difficult decisions necessary to address our fiscal problems.

Having served in the Legislature, I know we fight hard for federal dollars to help address many of our state’s needs; we accept federal monies for transportation, the military, education, and jobs programs. All play an important part in Alaska’s overall economy, just as the current Medicaid program — which already relies on significant federal funding — plays an important role in our economy, while providing needed health care to Alaska residents.

Make no mistake, we already spend a tremendous amount on medical care for the uninsured, in many cases on committed costs which cannot be cut. Medicaid expansion would shift a significant portion of these costs to the federal side, saving Alaska millions of dollars in expenses we are already obligated to and now pay entirely with state funds.

One of the most obvious examples is medical care of our prisoners. In FY16 alone, more than four million dollars — now spent on medical care of our prisoners — would be shifted to federal funds. We could also reduce state spending for Chronic and Acute Medical Assistance (CAMA) by an estimated $1.5 million in FY 16, by enrolling recipients in Medicaid. All told, savings to the State of Alaska’s general fund will exceed the 10 percent match amount required in 2020.

When we talk about Medicaid expansion, we’re talking about providing benefits to people who are currently falling through the cracks of our changing health care system. According to current data, over 43 percent of the people who fall within the income requirements for this program are actively working Alaskans, with an additional 29 percent working seasonally. They do not have enough income to afford insurance; their employers don’t provide it; and yet, they don’t currently qualify for assistance.

One way or another, we already pay for our uninsured citizens. Our Alaskan hospitals commit millions of dollars a year to uncompensated and charity care — care they are required to provide to everyone who comes through their doors, whether they have the ability to pay or not. The difference is made up, in part, by cost shifting, resulting in higher charges for services and higher insurance premiums.

Among the critiques I’ve heard in discussions on Medicaid expansion is that current Medicaid programs need reforms before we expand Medicaid services in Alaska. Governor Walker’s bill includes a variety of reform measures, including a care management pilot program to reduce unnecessary ER visits, a fraud and abuse control initiative, and tightening eligibility for certain services. Reforms should be — and are — done on a continual basis. Needed reform should not be an excuse for delaying or opposing Medicaid expansion.

Another critique is that federal dollars might disappear, leaving us holding the bag for millions of dollars in new program costs. Governor Walker has received assurances from the federal government that, if federal funds are reduced, Alaska can opt out at any time without penalty. Governor Walker’s bill makes Alaska’s participation contingent on the Federal government maintaining at least a 90 percent match.

The decision to expand Medicaid in Alaska — as Alaska sits perched on the thin edge of a financial precipice — makes good sense economically, fiscally and morally.

Mike Navarre serves as Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor.

More in Opinion

The Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. building is photographed in Juneau. (Clarise Larson/Juneau Empire file)
Opinion: State cannot afford better schools and also big PFDs

Most legislators believe more state money for local school districts should be on the list of essential services.

A sign welcomes employees and visitors at the Kenai Peninsula Borough administration building on Tuesday, March 17, 2020, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo by Victoria Petersen/Peninsula Clarion file)
Opinion: Fair property taxes, oh my

Our local tax system is not perfect, but it does represent an attempt to fairly balance community interests.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Education looms large in fast-paced start to session

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Meg Zaletel (Courtesy)
Opinion: Housing shouldn’t be a political issue — it’s a human right

Policies and budget decisions that impact housing impact people’s well-being.

Therese Lewandowski. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Let’s raise equal rights for women

There is much more to our gender inequality story.

The Alaska State Capitol is seen in this undated file photo. (Clarise Larson / Juneau Empire)
Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: U.S. should treat tariffs with a cold shoulder

The problem is that the U.S. imposes tariffs on what we buy.

A campfire can be seen at the Quartz Creek Campground in Cooper Landing, Alaska, in May 2020. (Clarion staff)
Opinion: What carbon capture and storage might mean for Alaska

Could Alaska be the next leader in carbon capture and storage?

Promotional image via intletkeeper.org.
Point of View: Learn efficiency at upcoming Homer Energy Fair

Energy conservation and efficiency have multiple benefits.

Congress holds a joint session to certify the election results of 2024 on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 6, 2025. President-elect Donald J. Trump has waffled on his preferences for how his party tackles his agenda, adding to the uncertainty for Republicans. (Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Opinion: The moral imperative of our time

Trump has made it very clear that he wants to control what the news media publishes.