Voices of the Peninsula: Ballot Measure 1 — Expect impacts to our local communities

Voices of the Peninsula: Ballot Measure 1 — Expect impacts to our local communities

Salmon have always been an integral part of our economy, as well as a fundamental part of our identity as Alaskans. We measure the value of salmon not only in escapement numbers and dollars, but also in their ability to enrich our lives and connect us with the land we cherish and call home.

Alaskans have long supported salmon-friendly policies and regulations. And that support has paid off in the most robust wild salmon runs in the world. In fact, our state has more than 18 state and federal policies that address salmon habitat protections. These policies have been enacted and/or updated over the years, with annual revisions and additions to the list of protected habitat.

Now supporters of Proposition 1, also known as the “Stand for Salmon” initiative, want to throw out a system that has worked for decades and replace it with one that is overly cumbersome, too rigid, too expensive and too time consuming. For communities like ours, it adds costs we can ill afford for little to no gain.

The resolution recently considered by the Soldotna City Council stated, in part: “… the City of Soldotna believes that a legislative process which allows for intense public input and review, rather than the proposed ballot initiative, would be a better approach to developing a new regulatory framework for salmon protection and development permitting …”

Besides Soldotna, the Kenai Chamber of Commerce has expressed reservations with Ballot Measure 1. A Kenai Chamber resolution points out that “[t]he ballot initiative places unattainable protection standards on community and village development, both large and small. Under the proposed permitting process, road projects, water projects, wastewater treatment projects in our communities would require a major permit as described by the initiative language.”

In the case of Soldotna, our immediate concern is repermiting our wastewater treatment facility because under Proposition 1, existing operations would only be exempt until their current permits expire. After that, they would be required to reapply for permits under the new regulations. Many operations or projects, potentially including ours, would not be able to comply.

Currently the permitting process for our wastewater facility applies science-based standards specific to our unique operation and location. These standards are designed to avoid adverse impacts to water quality and aquatic life, including salmon, and the city has invested significant resources to ensure that these standards are met.

What Proposition 1 does is impose an unknown, costly set of rules that invite litigation, which only leads to delays and even more costs. Just consider what happens if Soldotna can’t repermit our wastewater plant?

Alaskans care deeply about the part of the world we inhabit and take seriously the ecological impacts of our presence here. That is why our current habitat protections are robust and science-based. Finding a balance between environmental protection and development is difficult, but we have never backed down from that challenge. We do not ascribe to the fallacy that we must either conserve everything or develop everything, but instead we face the ongoing struggle to maintain a workable balance that provides for our civil needs while preserving the quality of the natural environment that hosts us.

If, as Alaskans, we decide that changes to habitat protections are needed, there are proven, science-based procedures available, not an “all-or-nothing,” “yes-or-no” vote on a ballot initiative that most voters have not read and do not understand. Implementing these kinds of policy changes without knowing their full impact is irresponsible and reckless.

For these reasons, I invite you to join me in voting no on ballot measure one in November.

Lisa Parker lives in Soldotna. A lifelong Alaskan, she has been deeply involved in public service for the past 48 years.

More in Opinion

Opinion: The buck stops at the top

Shared mistakes of Dunleavy and Biden.

A sign welcomes people to Kenai United Methodist Church on Monday, Sept. 6, 2021 in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
It’s time for a federal law against LGBTQ discrimination

When my wife and I decided to move to Alaska, we wondered if we would be welcome in our new neighborhood.

Terri Spigelmyer. (Photo provided)
Pay It Forward: Instilling volunteerism in the next generation

We hope to have instilled in our children empathy, cultural awareness, long-term planning and the selflessness of helping others

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Election integrity or right-wing power grab?

Dr. King would be appalled at what is happening today

Nancy HIllstrand. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Trail Lakes is the sockeye salmon hero, not Tutka Bay

Tutka hatchery produces a pink salmon monoculture desecrating Kachemak Bay State Park and Critical Habitat Area as a feed lot

A map of Kachemak Bay State Park shows proposed land additions A, B and C in House Bill 52 and the Tutka Bay Lagoon Hatchery. (Map courtesy of Alaska State Parks)
Opinion: Rep. Vance’s bill is anti-fishermen

House Bill 52 burdens 98.5% of Cook Inlet fishermen.

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020 at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Alaska Voices: Break the cycle of failure, debt in 2022

Today, all Americans are coerced, embarrassed or otherwise influenced into one of two old political parties

Charlie Franz.
Point of View: Election integrity is not anti-democratic

The federalization of elections by the Freedom to Vote Act infringes on the constitutional right of states to regulate elections.

Most Read