Voices of Alaska: How state funding is used by the Alaska Earthquake Center

  • By Michael West
  • Saturday, February 27, 2016 5:13pm
  • Opinion

As the state and university examine priorities, a very legitimate question is how something as ill defined as “research” can be central to the state’s well being. I can think of no organization to better illustrate the answer than the Alaska Earthquake Center. The Earthquake Center, housed at the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Geophysical Institute, is operating this year on $740,000 in state general funding, embedded in the university’s budget. These are the only monies spent by the state on earthquake monitoring, but this funding enables millions more from outside sources to support earthquake efforts. The state provides the nucleus to which other projects can attach.

For thirty years, the Center has used state monies to maintain a network of 150 earthquake monitoring stations that span the Aleutians to Southeast to the North Slope. The state owns the equipment, pays telecommunications costs, and supports engineers, technicians, data analysts and research scientists. Under direction from the state legislature (AS 14.40.075), the Alaska Earthquake Center maintains a public archive of all earthquake and volcanic seismic data, assesses hazards to the state, and provides 24/7 monitoring of the approximately 35,000 earthquakes that occur each year in Alaska.

Because this core facility exists, the Alaska Earthquake Center is able to secure add-on projects from federal agencies and corporate entities. A sample of these include:

National Weather Service. Support rapid tsunami warning with real-time data feeds.

U.S. Geological Survey. Support the national earthquake monitoring framework.

Alyeska Pipeline Service Corp. Provide custom monitoring along the pipeline corridor.

Alaska Energy Authority. Provide custom monitoring to Bradley Lake hydropower facility.

The Center is able to secure these projects because of the core earthquake monitoring facility supported by the state. These external funds are about three times larger than the direct state support. If the state-supported Alaska Earthquake Center did not exist, there would be no reason to fund these initiatives through the university (funded at about $25 million over the past decade).

Most important, however, having a state-sponsored earthquake facility allows externally-funded projects to pay back to the citizens of Alaska. When an earthquake such as the magnitude 7.1 on January 24 occurs, the resources from all of these projects are leveraged together to assess and track the event. The financial leadership of the state ensures that all of these resources work together in a single coordinated effort. So though state funding provides the core facility, the vast majority of Alaska’s earthquake monitoring effort is ultimately paid for by federal and corporate entities.

The Alaska Earthquake Center is in no way unique. Given the relevance of the center’s mission, however, and the degree of external funding, it seems a wonderfully clear example of how state funding is leveraged to provide Alaska with a far greater service than we would otherwise have.

Michael West is a State Seismologist for the Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

More in Opinion

Jodi Taylor is the board chair for Alaska Policy Forum. (Courtesy photo)
Private school, state reimbursement: family choice

By Jodi Taylor Alaskan parents have a legitimate right to choose the… Continue reading

t
Opinion: It’s time for bold action to protect our fisheries

Our fisheries feed the world and sustain our unique cultures and communities.

The logo for the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District is displayed inside the George A. Navarre Borough Admin Building on Thursday, July 22, 2021 in Soldotna, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: Hard to fill positions?

Paying poverty wages to support staff, secretaries and custodians is unacceptable yet routine behavior by our district

A copy of the State of Alaska Official Ballot for the June 11, 2022, Special Primary Election is photographed on May 2, 2022. (Peninsula Clarion staff)
Choosing a candidate – Who will best represent us in D.C.?

Voters are encouraged to do homework before casting a vote

Tourists watch as one of two cubs belonging to an 18-year-old sow black bear crosses the path between groups of tourists visiting the Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center on Wednesday, July 18, 2018. (Michael Penn / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Tourists have pushed us to critical mass in parts of Juneau

I don’t go to the glacier in the summer now to hike or watch bears.

Sens. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer, left, and Robert Myers, R-North Pole, read through one of 41 amendments submitted to the state’s omnibus budget bill being debate on the floor of the Alaska State Senate on Monday, May 9, 2022. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: The Alaska Senate’s foolish gamble

“All these conservative people just spent all our money”

Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships. (logo provided)
Point of View: A few ideas for Mental Health Awareness Month

What are some things you can practice this month and subsequently apply to your life?

Smoke from the Swan Lake Fire impairs visibility on the Sterling Highway on Aug. 20, 2019. (Photo by Victoria Petersen/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Alaskans should prepare for wildfire season

Several past large fire seasons followed snowy winters or unusually rainy springs

Alex Koplin is a founding member of Kenai Peninsula Votes. (courtesy photo)
Voices of the Peninsula: 1 candidate dined, 47 to go

By Alex Koplin Last month, I wrote a satirical piece for the… Continue reading

The logo of the Homer Trails Alliance.
Point of View: Connecting our community through trails

Homer is booming with housing development and the viability of long-standing trails is threatened