Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 must be defeated in an historically bad year

No one has been exempted from the 2020 roller coaster.

  • By OneALASKA co-chairs: Chantal Walsh, Bill Popp, John Sturgeon, Gary Dixon, Julie Sande, Genevieve Bell, Jason Grenn, Crawford Patkotak, Jill Schaefer, Nicholas Begich III, Jodi Taylor, Angie Tallant
  • Tuesday, October 27, 2020 10:54pm
  • Opinion

Alaska is as diverse as it is magnificent. People from all walks of life choose to make Alaska home because it offers so many things, natural beauty, a strong sense of community, abundant natural resources, and, above all, opportunity.

Just over a year ago, we came together as a diverse group of concerned Alaskans united against a real and serious threat to that opportunity — Ballot Measure 1. With that, OneAlaska was formed. We are organized labor, business and Alaska Native corporations, outdoor recreation, small business, nonpartisan political leaders, and more. We are your neighbors, your friends and your community leaders. But most importantly, we are Alaskans voting “no”.

No one has been exempted from the 2020 roller coaster. It has been a tumultuous year full of hardship and uncertainty for every Alaskan. We have watched family members lose jobs, our favorite restaurants and coffee shops close, and once-bustling office buildings empty. We are a state dependent on oil revenue, and amidst the COVID pandemic, have watched the price of oil plummet to historical lows. And to add to the anxiety, we are now being asked to vote on a ballot measure that will further damage our economic health. Not only is Ballot Measure 1 bad for Alaska’s future, it will not even provide the short-term fix proponents are falsely promising.

Proponents have spun a good story based on emotional sound bites and rhetoric, but the facts do not support them. The Vote Yes group has no independent studies, and no independent economic analysis that support their claims — none. Alaskans deserve better. Tax policy is complicated and requires study, debate, analysis and discussion. A significant, untested and risky tax increase during a time when the economy is in the ditch will not solve Alaska’s fiscal problems, in fact, it will make the state’s fiscal situation much worse in the long-term; it is dishonest to claim otherwise.

The dire effect Ballot Measure 1 will have on our state is not a matter of opinion. Multiple independent economic studies have confirmed what we know to be true. A study commissioned by the Legislature found that “the short-lived benefits (to the government) of the proposed changes will have to be carefully weighed against potential consequences in terms of the overall business environment, concerns over fiscal stability and associated investment (dis-)incentives on the North Slope and, indeed, elsewhere in the State.” Alaska Native corporations commissioned their own study which concluded “a new tax would further impact the economy and risk the employment of thousands of Alaskans, while simultaneously failing to deliver an effective and stable revenue model for the state.”

Perhaps most alarming, Alaska’s previous tax director Ken Alper, and a key drafter of Ballot Measure 1, recently said, “Ballot Measure 1 isn’t a perfect bill. It will be complicated to administer, and it has a couple of ambiguities.” He followed up with, “If the initiative passes, I believe it will spur the Legislature to come back and pass a clean-up bill.” Let that sink in — an actual drafter of the ballot measure does not believe it is good policy and needs to be fixed because the tax is too high. That is hardly a ringing endorsement. One must ask why are they trying to sell a flawed policy to Alaskans?

Voting is underway. Between now and Nov. 3, we have a choice to make about in which direction we want Alaska to move. Do we want a chance at economic recovery and a strong future? Or do we want to risk further damage to our fragile economy? No matter what you think about changing oil taxes, Ballot Measure 1 is not the way to do it — it is poorly written, and won’t achieve the results the proponents claim. That is why we are standing up for our workers, our economy, and our entire state. We strongly urge a “no” vote on Ballot Measure 1.

Submitted by OneALASKA co-chairs: Chantal Walsh, Bill Popp, John Sturgeon, Gary Dixon, Julie Sande, Genevieve Bell, Jason Grenn, Crawford Patkotak, Jill Schaefer, Nicholas Begich III, Jodi Taylor, Angie Tallant

• By members of OneALASKA

More in Opinion

This image available under the Creative Commons license shows the outline of the state of Alaska filled with the pattern of the state flag.
Opinion: Bringing broadband to all Alaskans

Too many Alaskans face barriers accessing the internet.

This photo shows a stack of pocket constitutions at the Alaska State Capitol. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire File)
Opinion: Join us in voting against a constitutional convention

Voting no on a constitutional convention is vital to the well-being and stability of our state.

Michael O’Meara.
Point of View: Tell BOEM how you feel

It seems like BOEM should prioritize input from people most likely to be affected if leases are sold

The State of Alaska, Department of Administration, Office of Information Technology webpage. (Screenshot/
Cloud migration now underway will strengthen, enhance State IT systems

At the most basic level, cloud computing is the delivery of computing services remotely

Jessica Cook, left, and Les Gara stand in The Peninsula Clarion’s offices on Thursday, June 30, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Alaska Voices: Better schools for a better economy

We need leaders who care about our children’s futures

A resident casts their vote in the regular municipal election Tuesday, Oct. 6, 2020, at the Kenai Peninsula Fairgrounds in Ninilchik, Alaska. (Photo by Megan Pacer/Homer News)
Voices of the Peninsula: This is our borough and city

By Therese Lewandowski Another election already? Yes! This is our local elections… Continue reading

The Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation building is seen in Juneau, Alaska, in March 2022. (Michael S. Lockett / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: APFC keeps steady keel during turbulent year

FY2022 was a challenging year for all investors

Homer Foundation
Point of View: Nonprofits provide essential services not provided by cities

By our count, nonprofits provide more than 100 jobs to our communities

Opinion: Don’t get scammed like I nearly did

I should have just turned off the computer.

Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Charlie Pierce campaigns for governor as he walks in the 65th annual Soldotna Progress Days Parade on Saturday, July 23, 2022 in Soldotna, Alaska. Pierce resigned as borough mayor effective Sept. 30, 2022, to focus on his gubernatorial campaign. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Voices of the Peninsula: ‘It has been an honor to serve’

Borough mayor gives send-off ahead of departure

Gov. Mike Dunleavy announces Friday, July 15, 2022, that 2022 most PFD payments will be distributed on Sept. 20, 2022. (Screenshot)
Opinion: A historic PFD still leaves work to be done

It is important to remember the dividend is not, and has never been, a welfare payment