Good habitat regulations worth the effort

  • Saturday, December 10, 2016 11:51am
  • Opinion

A group of fishery stakeholders is proposing that the Board of Fisheries ask the Legislature to update the permitting process for projects that impact salmon habitat.

For a region reliant on both strong salmon returns and responsible resource development, we think an update to Title 16, the section of Alaska statute that outlines the responsibilities of Fish and Game, is worth the Legislature’s time. Currently, Alaska statute states that the commissioner of Fish and Game shall issue a permit unless the activity is determined to be insufficient for the protection of fish and game resources.

However, according to the diverse group of stakeholders, clarification is needed on what constitutes sufficient protection when it comes to salmon habitat.

To that end, a draft letter has been submitted to the fish board for its consideration. The draft, submitted to the board at its Lower Cook Inlet meeting, outlines three themes: improving the public notification and public comment process, the presumption of anadromous waters and the need for better defined enforceable standards.

“The board recognizes the broad responsibilities of the Legislature to promote economic development and the wise stewardship of resources for all Alaskans,” the draft letter states. “The board finds that clear delineation of Alaska’s unwavering promise to protect salmon and fisheries habitat establishes a consistent and predictable business environment that will help all individuals and corporations wishing to do business in Alaska.”

The portion of the draft we would like to emphasize here is the phrase “consistent and predictable” which is why a better definition of sufficient habitat protection is needed. There already are numerous state and federal agencies tasked with permitting and oversight of projects the region’s waters; we don’t want to see another set of regulations impeding responsible development.

But efforts in recent years to “streamline” permitting have had the potential effect of removing Alaskans from participation in the process — remember the controversy just a few years ago over House Bill 77 regarding use of state land?

Here on the Kenai Peninsula, we’ve also had our struggles with how to regulate activity on anadromous waters — one of the reasons for which is that their aren’t any guidelines in state statute on protecting salmon habitat. And even after passing the ordinance, it took two years — including a year’s worth of task force meetings — to make the legislation workable for borough residents.

Going by that experience, creating statewide guidelines for salmon habitat protection will be no easy task, and lawmakers certainly will have a lot on the docket come January, when they will again attempt to find solutions to the state’s $3 billion-plus deficit.

Crafting a set of reasonable habitat protection regulations will take some time and effort, but if the end result is protection for salmon habitat and consistent and predictable resource development regulation, it will have been worth it.

More in Opinion

Jackson Carney of Wrangell, a student in the Federal Subsistence Board Policy and Procedures class at the University of Alaska Southeast, testifies before the Federal Subsistence Board. (Photo by Ryan Morse/courtesy)
Point of View: Helping the next generation of hunters and fishermen to have a say

Ultimately, the goal is to ensure Alaskans, and young people, have a say in the decisions that affect them.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024 (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Failure of HB 69 takes us back to square one

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Beach seine nets are pulled from the waters of Cook Inlet at a test site for the gear near Kenai, Alaska, on Tuesday, July 30, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Expand the set beach seine experiment

A path forward to resolve the Upper Cook Inlet King and sockeye salmon commercial fishing and conservation crisis.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: When politics win, our schools lose

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

courtesy
Opinion: To prevent abuse and neglect, support child care providers

Quality, affordable child care makes society function.

Logo courtesy of League of Women Voters.
Point of View: Tell your representatives SAVE Act is not needed

The SAVE Act will disenfranchise Alaska voters and make the process of voting much more restrictive.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in favor of overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024 (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Capitol Corner: Taking steps toward a balanced budget

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman reports back from Juneau.

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna, speaks in support of debating an omnibus education bill in the Alaska House Chambers on Monday, Feb. 19, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Capitol Corner: Dedicated to doing the work on education

Rep. Justin Ruffridge reports back from Juneau.

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks at a town hall meeting in the Moose Pass Sportsman’s Club in Moose Pass, Alaska, on Friday, Feb. 28, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)

Most Read