Alaska Voices: In Support of the Constitutional Amendments

Let’s constitutionally protect our right to vote on any new taxes.

  • Thursday, April 18, 2019 10:06pm
  • Opinion

Here we go again, seems like I’ve been defending all three of these issues my whole political life, 40-plus years. The difference this time that we have a reasonable governor who is rationally trying to permanently resolve these recurring issues, to the extent possible once and for all by enshrining them in the State Constitution. You’ll hear politicians, bureaucrats and special interest howling that this will restrict their ability to fund essential government services. Nonsense, it will however provide discipline and require discussion with “We the People” to determine what essential services are and how and by whom, they should be efficiently provided.

To accomplish this Gov. Dunleavy has proposed three constitutional amendments, one would create a formula to put a cap on spending, another would require a vote of Alaskans to increase taxes and finally he would constitutionally guarantee the PFD. I strongly support these amendments and urge every Alaskan who wants to put a lid on state government growth and preserve the PFD to get up off of your posteriors and go to work. You can help by aggressively encouraging your family and friends to do likewise. You can do this by becoming politically active on this one issue; let’s focus and do this. Passing SJR 4, 5 and 6 is the single most important issue our legislative representatives must pass this session. Your involvement is very critical as it takes a two thirds vote of each the House and the Senate to pass them so we can vote on them in the next general election. That’s clearly a major challenge but one we can and must do! Then all we have to do is to pass them with a majority vote and Alaska and Alaskans will be in a much better place.

Let’s briefly discuss each amendment. First the permanent fund is made up almost exclusively of Royalty income, that is 12.5% of the value of the extracted oil. It is critically important to understand the Royalty income rightly belongs to the People and should be distributed to them as equitably as possible, while the severance tax is rightly imposed by the state government and should be used to fund appropriate government services. These are two distinctly different pots of money and should serve different purposes. Jay Hammond and I did not agree on the income tax repeal but we did agree that the royalty income does belong to the people directly. To quote Gov. Hammond in 1980, he said while discussing the royalty income that “we are taking wealth that belongs to the people and making sure that at least some of it is funneled through their pockets instead of through their elected officials.” Jay clearly understood that the dividend, ownership rights, should be treated differently than tax revenue. He also strongly wanted a dividend provision in the original Constitutional Amendment establishing the permanent fund legislation but the Legislature would not go along so he had to drop it. Too bad so sad! It’s accurate to say that back in the ‘80s Jay and I both wanted the PFD enshrined in the Constitution. I still do and would like to think that he would also. Let’s do it now, we’ve waited long enough.

Next, a constitutional spending limit, this was approved in the early 1980s but it was literally a joke. The Legislature was reacting to strong public opposition to their spending spree and to pacify the peasants they created a title that said, Spending Limit, but they knew the formula was so high that it would never be activated. I was there and saw them literally joking and laughing about pulling a fast one on the people. Let us now pass the governor’s spending limit, which is calculated to work.

Lastly, very importantly and quite self-explanatory, let’s constitutionally protect our right to vote on any new taxes. Many jurisdictions require voter approval on tax increases as it is a traditional American concept. We are the only nation ever founded on the principles of individual rights and responsibility. Let’s honor that responsibility and those principles.

We can make this happen but we can also miss the opportunity to take a bit of control over our own destiny. As always it’s up to each of us individually and we Alaskans collectively to put enough pressure on our elected representatives to persuade them to at least give us the opportunity to vote our convictions. You can do your part by persuading your friends and family to do the same.

Getting these three constitutional amendments passed through the Legislature is the most important issue before us this session of the Legislature.

Let’s just do it.

Richard Randolph served eight years in the Alaska Legislature and lives in Fairbanks.


• Richard Randolph served eight years in the Alaska Legislature and lives in Fairbanks.


More in Opinion

Alaska State Sen. Jesse Bjorkman (R-Nikiski), left, and Alaska House Rep. Ben Carpenter (R-Nikiski) participate in the Senate District D candidate forum hosted by the Peninsula Clarion and KDLL 91.9 FM on Monday, Oct. 7, 2024, at the Soldotna Public Library in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Carpenter has a much better fiscal plan

The sales tax is only one component included in a larger package of bills

"Miss Rosey," a pink fire engine dedicated to raising awareness about cancer prevention and screening, is seen after her unveiling at Central Peninsula Hospital in Soldotna, Alaska, on Saturday, Sept. 28, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: The lifesaving power of early detection

A call to action during Breast Cancer Awareness Month

Pins supporting the repeal of ranked choice voting are seen on April 20, 2024, at the Republican state convention in Anchorage. (James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Opinion: Do we really need to be re-educated to vote?

Our party primaries were meant to bring the top two (or three) people to the final election for the final vote

This photo shows a sample ballot for the Aug. 16, 2022, special general election. The election was the debut of ranked choice voting in Alaska. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire)
Opinion: Keep officials accountable to Alaskans, not party insiders, by voting no on Ballot Measure 2

Alaska’s nonpartisan election system protects every Alaskan’s right to vote for their chosen candidate at every election, regardless of party affiliation

Nick Begich III campaign materials sit on tables ahead of a May 16, 2022, GOP debate held in Juneau. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: Begich’s business shows commitment to Alaska

Headquarters in Alaska creates local jobs

Baisden family dog, Tug, is photographed in this undated photo. (Photo courtesy Rhonda Baisden)
Opinion: Ode to a good boy

The reality of saying goodbye hit us like a freight train

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Opinion: Why we’re not ranking Vance on the ballot

We will rank the other two candidates

Kenai Courthouse is photographed on Feb. 26, 2019, in Kenai, Alaska. (Clarion file)
Opinion: Seeking justice for our son

These state troopers need to be held accountable for their actions, and never let this happen again

This November 2022 file photos shows Alaska Division of Elections Director Gail Fenumiai explaining the ranked choice tabulation for the 2022 U.S. House race. Democratic incumbent Mary Peltola prevailed over Republican former Gov. Sarah Palin by a final tally of 54.9% to 45.1% after lower-finishing candidates Republican Nick Begich III amd Libertarian Chris Bye were eliminated during the first two rounds of instant choice runoffs. (Mark Sabbatini/Juneau Empire file)
Opinion: Ranked choice voting and open primaries diminish political party control. That’s great for Alaska.

The fact that both private political organizations are opposed to open primaries and RCV should be a red flag for us all

Most Read