CINGSA wins rights to storage space

The Alaska Supreme Court has decided that Kenai has no claim to the gas storage rights used by Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska, a company which injects natural gas into a porous sandstone formation lying below city property in and around the mouth of the Kenai River.

In an opinion issued Friday, the Alaska Supreme Court justices acknowledged the difficulty of the case, writing that “there is a notable lack of consensus in the courts and among legal scholars on the issue of pore-space ownership.”

This lack of consensus allowed Kenai to claim a right to the underground storage space as the owner of the surface above it, and for CINGSA to claim the storage space for the holders of the mineral rights — itself and its co-defendants, the state and Native Corporation Cook Inlet Region, Inc. CINGSA began operating in 2012, storing gas belonging to other utilities in a porous underground sandstone layer for withdrawal during the higher-demand winter season. Kenai, owner of approximately 1,100 acres of land above the CINGSA storage area, claimed it should be compensated for storage beneath 576 of those acres. In March 2012 CINGSA brought the disagreement to Kenai’s superior court, where Judge Carl Bauman decided in favor of CINGSA and the mineral rights holders, giving no compensation to Kenai and ruling that the city pay CIRI $22,916 in court fees.

Kenai appealed both decisions to the Alaska Supreme Court, where the case was heard on Sept. 17, 2015.

Arguing on behalf of Kenai, attorney Bruce Falconer made a case for the city’s gas storage rights based on the Alaska statute by which the state reserves for itself mineral rights — listed in the statute as “all oils, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fissionable materials, geothermal resources, and fossils of every name, kind, and description.”

Falconer argued that this specific list does not include pores, which as empty spaces within a mineral body could not themselves be minerals.

Because gas storage takes place within the pores of a sandstone formation rather than in the stone itself, the rights to storage could not be reserved for the state as a mineral and were therefore not covered by the statute. Citing a precedent called the “American Rule,” Falconer argued that the question of gas storage rights relied instead on the deed giving the land’s surface to Kenai from the state.

Originating in hard-rock mining law, the American Rule gives vacant caverns from which minerals have been extracted to the owners of the land above, rather than to the mineral right owner.

Before being used for storage by CINGSA, the formation below the Kenai River had been a producing gas field owned by Marathon Oil, until it was depleted. Falconer argued that this made it similar to the 1978 Oklahoma district court case Ellis v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company,” in which a surface owner was given compensation for subterranean gas storage based on the American Rule.

In its Friday opinion, the Alaska Supreme Court rejected Falconer’s points, ruling that gas storage is a mineral right covered by the statute rather than a right belonging to the deeded surface owner via the American Rule.

In addition to the unclear concept of gas storage rights, the Supreme Court’s opinion points out another ambiguous term: “mineral.”

“’Minerals’ are not defined by the Alaska Land Act,” the justices wrote. “Nor have we defined the term in the context of (the mineral reservation statute), though we have stated that the question of what is a mineral is a vexatious one. Other courts have concluded that that the meaning of ‘minerals’ is ambiguous and have interpreted the term broadly…”

In the absence of a clear definition, the justices wrote that they defined the “minerals” referred to in the mineral reservation statute by reading the statute according to its intent.

“To establish the meaning of a statute, we examine both its text and its purpose,” the justices wrote in their opinion. “We give statutory language a reasonable or common-sense construction, consonant with the objectives of the legislature.”

The justices cite another rule in their reading of the statue.

“We also apply the rule of statutory interpretation that ambiguities in the public land grants are resolved strictly against the grantee and in favor of the government,” the justices wrote in their opinion.

With this principal, the justices rejected the idea that the state’s mineral rights do not include pore space as “too simplistic.”

“The matrices that create pore space and give it form — such as dolomite, limestone, lignite, and sandstone — are certainly mineral,” the justices wrote in their opinion. “Without these minerals, the pore space would not exist.”

The justices accepted this pore-inclusive definition of mineral rights as “supported by the (mineral reservation) statute’s apparent purpose.”

“We have recognized that the overall purpose of the Alaska Land Act is to maximize revenue for the state and have interpreted sections of it as intended to provide for orderly oil and gas leasing that maximizes state return on its oil and gas resources… CIRI and the State thus argue that interpreting “minerals” to include pore-space rights better serves various legislative goals: pore space itself is a valuable State resource, its ownership is unnecessary to the full enjoyment of the surface estate, and treating pore space differently from the rest of the mineral estate would be problematic for purposes of planning, leasing, and management.”

CINGSA v. City of Kenai was the Supreme Court’s first ruling on a gas storage rights case. Kenai city attorney Scott Bloom said it was precedent-setting.

“The law in Alaska is now that pore space belongs to the mineral estate,” Bloom said.

 

Reach Ben Boettger at ben.boettger@peninsulaclarion.com.

More in News

An 86 pound Kenai River king salmon is measured in Soldotna, Alaska, on June 29, 1995. (M. Scott Moon/Peninsula Clarion File)
Kenai River king salmon fishing closed entirely for 3rd year

Kenai River king salmon were designated a stock of management concern in 2023.

The Kenai Peninsula College Main Entrance on Aug. 18, 2022, in Soldotna, Alaska. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
University of Alaska Board of Regents to meet in Soldotna

The last time the board met on the Kenai Peninsula was April 2012.

Kenai Peninsula Borough School District Board of Education member Penny Vadla and student representative Emerson Kapp speak to the joint Alaska House and Senate education committees in Juneau, Alaska, on Monday, Feb. 10, 2025. (Screenshot courtesy Gavel Alaska/KTOO)
KPBSD among dozens of districts to deliver in-person testimony to Alaska Legislature

Districts spotlighted programs already lost over years of stagnant funding that hasn’t met inflationary pressure.

Rep. Bill Elam, R-Nikiski, speaks during a town hall meeting hosted by his office at the Nikiski Community Recreation Center in Nikiski, Alaska, on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2025. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Education dominates Elam’s 1st town hall as state rep

Education funding dominated much of the conversation.

Kenai Middle School Principal Vaughn Dosko points out elements of a redesign plan for the front of the school on Wednesday, Sept. 21, 2022, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Work soon to begin on Kenai Middle security upgrades

The security upgrades are among several key KPBSD maintenance projects included in a bond approved by borough voters in October 2022.

The Kenai Fire Department headquarters are photographed on Feb. 13, 2018, in Kenai, Alaska. (Peninsula Clarion file)
Kenai adds funds, authorizes contract for study of emergency services facility

The building shared by Kenai’s police and fire departments hasn’t kept up with the needs of both departments, chief says.

Kenai Parks and Recreation Director Tyler Best shows off a new inclusive seesaw at Kenai Municipal Park in Kenai, Alaska, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Kenai awards contract to develop Parks and Rec master plan

The document is expected to guide the next 20 years of outdoors and recreation development in the city.

Balancing Act’s homepage for the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District’s Fiscal Year 2026 Budget. (Screenshot)
KPBSD launches ‘Balancing Act’ software, calls for public to balance $17 million deficit

The district and other education advocates have said that the base student allocation has failed to keep up with inflation.

Natural gas processing equipment is seen at Furie Operating Alaska’s central processing facility in Nikiski, Alaska, on Wednesday, July 10, 2024. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Harvest Alaska announces proposed redevelopment of Kenai LNG terminal

The project could deliver additional natural gas supplies to the Southcentral market as early as 2026, developers said.

Most Read